From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use devm_regulator_get_optional() Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:01:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20130812100152.GK6427@sirena.org.uk> References: <1376071683-19013-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OEp3pE+VUYV0MT2S" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Shawn Guo , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org --OEp3pE+VUYV0MT2S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:52:00AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Over that it would have been useful if we could have this patch as part > of the series you posted for defining devm_regulator_get_optional(), > and so we could have seen what's that patch is doing.. It's in -next. There's rather a lot of regulator users in the kernel. --OEp3pE+VUYV0MT2S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSCLKNAAoJELSic+t+oim9uLgP/2Yw/PbN/YVHMXuJ4OugPuBi h0rz/1vRPqUrfjsHx53dTlb05zSoTLoEg5fMo+ALY/fMTxji3n7hnOjlEIMYp9aE jlSEEBiIlgkHDxeCuQMxrEHN99bsAlBddtX+HoM12Vy79oALz2PLS1Ay/7Y3XUUL VeAmOlYi4IyyNUO7ekWtCs8MzkZKpEIBvQuillhrXZpuHoRIzlkZbR6fSplFg1eo tWtIOBIDcbp6JxRpmpCOlpDDV3mjcfOjarVFdTBOdrEspyj64ZDY4oehTz9MyaCQ vLN78i/7r0w4fODXGMecZn1WikOf1bYktnnX7UkPJr6bqGr8dFqpRGAPXXMqdtAy Op3ZHlXgiiNzp2TP2+zWbDDOhxfaSJHpz8PjjOgJZ6JUShdxpy4MDycrDyPkW4K7 w+LQz77pEITcnEBPgKmTMBgh7zbuoqkGWSfEGU57byHcqzZrxlYQs3n5RLVjmvJv 3s0SB5TE80A7do9EnNOenJr6JVLbU8iQC+moikFamFTyJ6cZhgrcgZP1vFr00DVa PJeYfCy8X7wlgPIG1FfjMWu9SVW/Ws17sMNyAMNuTzOny726wKph8zMBpWR0NVih pqYQDBHuDCHKwScPD37mfCWqoiTlbFtrHfWIFU66tuRP9BY3UpnIYlSQbAc7OYx0 PYw75Xi4+xQ8iYyzVcuv =0Bbr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OEp3pE+VUYV0MT2S--