From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [stable request <=3.7] acpi-cpufreq: set current frequency based on target P-State Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:05:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20140411160543.GC31676@kroah.com> References: <20131220081912.GA13684@hobo.Home> <1395785057-28903-1-git-send-email-vlee@twopensource.com> <20140325221803.GA32518@hobo.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=or6w1DOaHwEeKUHNYR7WyQ4LKTE=; b=LZnx/cm7qgIJqDErwjrLu949ss0Q pcapRCWhubaOUZFxrRG+y+L1e1Vsq1KSIst227tEcj0p41/RfjHHz0FsMB/t3nAn nZTNyiJR42KxCwDaQVuPQIbebBNf0Pvw2hnZBks6Cjkb/uJ2hevqxlB2Jkw9YD2P +K1mdEf+Q0ZpKNk= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140325221803.GA32518@hobo.lan> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: rosslagerwall@gmail.com Cc: Vinson Lee , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:18:03PM +0000, rosslagerwall@gmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 03:04:16PM -0700, Vinson Lee wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Please backport upstream commit 8673b83bf2f013379453b4779047bf3c6ae387e4 > > "acpi-cpufreq: set current frequency based on target P-State" to stable > > kernels 3.7 and earlier. This patch enables the kernel to control > > P-states on several platforms. Without this patch, the kernel was unable > > to control P-states on the same platforms. > > > > The upstream patch cleanly applies to 3.7. > > > > A backported patch is needed with the removal of SYSTEM_AMD_MSR_CAPABLE > > for kernels 3.6 and earlier. > > > > I seem to recall that the problem was a regression introduced by commit > 5a1c0228 (cpufreq: Avoid calling cpufreq driver's target() routine if > target_freq == policy->cur) which was introduced in the 3.8 cycle. Are > you sure it is necessary for kernels < 3.8? Given the lack of response here, I'm dropping these from my queue. If someone wants them back in, please resend after responding to this... greg k-h