From: GoatZilla <goatzilla@gmail.com>
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [2.6. PATCH] Missing default governor choices
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:15:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39e348480408301015550c3ad3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040829123200.GA16050@dominikbrodowski.de>
Is there something wrong with wanting powersave activated as soon as possible?
If a user wants performance at bootup, he can choose the performance
governor as default.
If a user wants to maintain the startup speed at bootup, he can choose
the userspace governor as default.
If a user wants powersaving at bootup... Too bad, go write a startup script?
It's not a big issue; I wrote a startup script for it myself. I was
just left wondering why I had to write a startup script in the first
place.
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:32:00 +0200, Dominik Brodowski
<linux@dominikbrodowski.de> wrote:
> > What's the reason for the powersave governor not being selectable as
> > default?
>
> Because it doesn't matter much:
> - performance is available during boot so that CPUs starting up at less than
> 100% can be boosted to full performance very soon.
> - userspace is available to keep the CPU speed at what it was at boot, and
> to allow existing userspace-based setups to work [it offers an equivalent
> interface compared to the one of the old 2.4. cpufreq interface]
>
> All other settings [including min/max ranges, governor for "continuing" use] can
> and should be done by either a startup script and/or a userspace daemon.
>
> Dominik
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-29 12:32 [2.6. PATCH] Missing default governor choices Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-30 17:15 ` GoatZilla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39e348480408301015550c3ad3@mail.gmail.com \
--to=goatzilla@gmail.com \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox