From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bas Mevissen <ml@basmevissen.nl>
Subject: Re: cpufreq and 2.4.
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:14:26 +0200
Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <3F40A702.8040103@basmevissen.nl>
References: <20030817153510.GA2361@brodo.de> <20030818073948.GC18032@poupinou.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20030818073948.GC18032@poupinou.org>
Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot@poupinou.org>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

Ducrot Bruno wrote:

> 
>>C) No documentation for 2.4. cpufreq user interfaces
>>As they're deprecated, I didn't explain them in the 2.6. kernel
>>Documentation (Documentation/cpu-freq/user.txt). However, if it really
>>should be documented well if it gets into the 2.4. stable series.
>>
>>D) Who?
>>Who is going to do C), and who will keep track of cpufreq-2.4.? 
> 
> My poor english prevent me to do C) (but perhaps a kind soul with good
> french knowledge and good english may assist me ?)
> I can track cpufreq-2.4 if really needed.
> 

I guess my English is better than my French, so I'm happy to assist you 
with C) :-))

I think it to be a good way to learn about cpufreq internals by writing 
documentation for it.

Regards,

Bas.