Re: [PATCH 2.6.8-rc2] speedstep SMT support

[Christian Hoelbling <christian.holbling@cern.ch>]

  hi and thanks alot for your comments!

Dominik Brodowski wrote:

>
>This I'd prefer not to be merged: 
>a) CONFIG_SMP doesn't mean cpu_sibling_map exist, e.g. on non-x86 architectures
>b) it "emulates" sibling-awareness, though the governors are not.
>  
>
 agree on both of these

>Instead, I'd prefer if we keep up with the "only-register-one-CPU" in the
>speedstep-ich case until a proper SMT patchkit is applied.
>
>However, for the other changes: could you consider my opinions, maybe update it
>and resend it, please? 
>
>  
>
  i will gladly do. however, i am a bit afraid of missing some patch - 
could you send me a diff of your source tree to a recent vanilla source 
so i know where to start from? or is there some repository somewhere 
that i don't know about where the cpufreq development sources are kept?

 thanks alot,

chris