cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq_ondemand
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:35:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4172F3C5.8090604@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041017222916.GA30841@inskipp.digriz.org.uk>

Alexander Clouter wrote:
>> 3. (major) the scaling up and down of the cpufreq is now smoother.  I found 
> 	it really nasty that if it tripped < 20% idle time that the freq was 
> 	set to 100%.  This code smoothly increases the cpufreq as well as 
> 	doing a better job of decreasing it too

I'd much prefer it shot up to 100% or else every time the cpu usage went 
up there'd be an obvious lag till the machine ran at it's capable speed. 
  I very much doubt the small amount of time it spent at 100% speed with 
the default design would decrease the battery life significantly as well.

Cheers,
Con

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-17 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-17 22:29 [PATCH] cpufreq_ondemand Alexander Clouter
2004-10-17 22:35 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-10-17 22:44   ` Alexander Clouter
2004-10-19 18:22   ` Bruno Ducrot
2004-10-20  5:03   ` Andre Eisenbach
2004-10-20  7:35     ` Len Brown
2004-10-20 14:30       ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-10-20 21:03         ` Len Brown
2004-10-20 21:18           ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-10-17 22:45 ` Nebojsa Trpkovic
2004-10-18  7:27   ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-10-18  7:20 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-10-18  8:12   ` Mattia Dongili
2004-10-18  8:25   ` Alexander Clouter
2004-10-18  8:59     ` Dominik Brodowski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-18  4:56 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2004-10-18  8:39 ` Alexander Clouter
2004-10-18  8:54   ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-10-19  5:06   ` Willy Tarreau
2004-10-18 22:48 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2004-10-18 23:18 ` Alexander Clouter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4172F3C5.8090604@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox