cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chris stones <chris.stones@gmail.com>
To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: cpu-freq causing kernel lock-up after upgrading to 1GB ram.
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 17:37:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42877AB1.8050100@gmail.com> (raw)

This is my first attempt at a bug report, so forgive me for making a 
mess, I will try my best.

-------------------------
hardware:
-------------------------
mobo: Chaintech VNF3-250
chipset: nForce-3
CPU: amd64 Athlon 3400+
Ram: 2 * Kingston 512Meg DDR400 PC3200 2T timeing 3-3-8-3. (total 1GB)
Swap : 1.3 Gb.

--------------------------
software:
--------------------------
Distro: Gentoo 2005.0 (comiped as 64bit with multilib)
GCC: gcc version 3.4.3 20041125 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3-r1, ssp-3.4.3-0, 
pie-8.7.7)
kernel versions: gentoo 2.6.11-r7; vanilla-2.6.10; vanilla-2.6.11.9

--------------------------
description:
--------------------------
I have been using the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand, powernow_k8 
to regulate my cpu clock for over 6 months with the hardware 
configureation shown above, minus one 512meg ram module.

Recently, i shutdown the box, and added the second memory module.
At the time, the cpu_fre drivers were compiled into the kernel, shortly 
after booting, the system would freese when cpu_freq lowered my cpu to 
its idle state of 1Ghz.

These conditions must all be met to cause the lock-up.
1) Both Ram moodules are used (1GB ram)
2) the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand, powernow_k8 are loaded.
3) The lockup occurs when the cpu is slowing down from a period of heavy 
load.

2 hours running memtest86 shows that my memory is not the problem.

one one occasion, the kernel gave a memory dump before the freeze. i 
regret i didnt take note of its rull contents, but a function trace line 
mentioned a cpu_freq function call.

If i remove one of the 512meg memory modules, the cpu_freq 
performsperfectly, as it has for the past 6 months.

Thankyou for taking the time to read my post.
Is there anything i can do (other than go without  ram or cpu_freq) to 
solve this ?
is there any more information you require from me ?

I have googled, but found no other similar bug reports.

 From Chris.stones@gmail.com.

             reply	other threads:[~2005-05-15 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-15 16:37 chris stones [this message]
2005-05-15 23:49 ` cpu-freq causing kernel lock-up after upgrading to 1GB ram Nebojsa Trpkovic
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-16 15:19 Langsdorf, Mark
2005-05-16 17:08 ` Nebojsa Trpkovic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42877AB1.8050100@gmail.com \
    --to=chris.stones@gmail.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox