From: chris stones <chris.stones@gmail.com>
To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: RE: cpufreq bug with 2 DIMM's on VNF3-250.
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 17:35:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <428A1D60.3050509@gmail.com> (raw)
If its my Motherboard....
Then why does cpu frequency scaling work perfectly fine in Knoppix 0.6 ????
what does the cpu-frequency driver do in knoppix 0.6 (2.6 kernel option)
that th vanilla kernel doesnt ???
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk
<mailto:cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk>
>> [mailto:cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk] On Behalf Of
>> Nebojsa Trpkovic
>> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 6:50 PM
>> To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk <mailto:cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
>> Subject: Re: cpu-freq causing kernel lock-up after upgrading
>> to 1GB ram.
>>
>>
>> Same problem here - VNF3-250 - if there's one RAM module
>> C'n'Q works fine, and if I put two modules it freezes every
>> time I try to change frequency, no matter linux or windows.
>> So, it's not cpufreq related problem - it just buggy VNF3-250
>> C'n'Q inplementation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> chris stones wrote:
>>
>
>>> > This is my first attempt at a bug report, so forgive me for
>
>> making a
>
>>> > mess, I will try my best.
>>> >
>>> > -------------------------
>>> > hardware:
>>> > -------------------------
>>> > mobo: Chaintech VNF3-250
>>> > chipset: nForce-3
>>> > CPU: amd64 Athlon 3400+
>>> > Ram: 2 * Kingston 512Meg DDR400 PC3200 2T timeing 3-3-8-3.
>
>> (total 1GB)
>
>>> > Swap : 1.3 Gb.
>>> >
>>> > --------------------------
>>> > software:
>>> > --------------------------
>>> > Distro: Gentoo 2005.0 (comiped as 64bit with multilib)
>>> > GCC: gcc version 3.4.3 20041125 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3-r1, ssp-3.4.3-0,
>>> > pie-8.7.7)
>>> > kernel versions: gentoo 2.6.11-r7; vanilla-2.6.10; vanilla-2.6.11.9
>>> >
>>> > --------------------------
>>> > description:
>>> > --------------------------
>>> > I have been using the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand,
>>> > powernow_k8 to regulate my cpu clock for over 6 months with the
>>> > hardware configureation shown above, minus one 512meg ram module.
>>> >
>>> > Recently, i shutdown the box, and added the second memory
>
>> module. At
>
>>> > the time, the cpu_fre drivers were compiled into the
>
>> kernel, shortly
>
>>> > after booting, the system would freese when cpu_freq
>
>> lowered my cpu to
>
>>> > its idle state of 1Ghz.
>>> >
>>> > These conditions must all be met to cause the lock-up.
>>> > 1) Both Ram moodules are used (1GB ram)
>>> > 2) the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand, powernow_k8 are loaded.
>>> > 3) The lockup occurs when the cpu is slowing down from a period of
>>> > heavy load.
>>> >
>>> > 2 hours running memtest86 shows that my memory is not the problem.
>>> >
>>> > one one occasion, the kernel gave a memory dump before the
>
>> freeze. i
>
>>> > regret i didnt take note of its rull contents, but a function trace
>>> > line mentioned a cpu_freq function call.
>>> >
>>> > If i remove one of the 512meg memory modules, the cpu_freq
>>> > performsperfectly, as it has for the past 6 months.
>>> >
>>> > Thankyou for taking the time to read my post.
>>> > Is there anything i can do (other than go without ram or
>
>> cpu_freq) to
>
>>> > solve this ? is there any more information you require from me ?
>>> >
>>> > I have googled, but found no other similar bug reports.
>>> >
>>> > From Chris.stones@gmail.com <mailto:Chris.stones@gmail.com>.
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Cpufreq mailing list
>>> > Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk <mailto:Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
>>> > http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq
>>> >
>
>>
>>
reply other threads:[~2005-05-17 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=428A1D60.3050509@gmail.com \
--to=chris.stones@gmail.com \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox