cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Belmonte <john@neggie.net>
To: "Devriendt, Paul" <paul.devriendt@amd.com>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: powernow-k8 and stuck change-pending bit
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:29:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42CFDF41.3040504@neggie.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A843028F4CC5@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com>

Devriendt, Paul wrote:
>>symptoms:
>>
>>    After working fine for a while (several minutes to several hours),
>>cpufreq seems to get into a bad state where:
>>
>>     * change pending bit set / stuck kernel messages appear
>>
>>     * reloading powernow-k8 module fails, with "change 
>>pending bit stuck"
> 
[...]
> The most likely scenario here is the VRM was unable to change
> voltage, and that means flaky hardware as it has previously been
> able to successfully do so. The reason I pick on the VRM and not
> some sort of issue with the HyperTransport fabric is that it is
> unlikely anything would still be alive if there was some sort of 
> problem coming back from the LDT_STOP.
> 
> Assuming the VRM continues to supply the current voltage within 
> spec, the system will stay up indefinitely, at the current
> voltage and frequency.
> 
> The best path to follow would be to investigate warrantee replacement
> of the board.

Thanks for the info Paul.  I've had the motherboard replaced with an
identical model.  This new board seems to have the same problem, except
that when a transition finally fails, Linux hangs bad enough to require
a hard reset of the system.

With two boards having this problem, it suggests either a bad
motherboard design or some bad interaction between Linux and the
motherboard.  (It seems strange that the manufacturer wouldn't have seen
this problem under Windows.)  Much less likely is that I have a bad CPU.

--John

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-09 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-07  5:07 powernow-k8 and stuck change-pending bit Devriendt, Paul
2005-07-09 14:29 ` John Belmonte [this message]
2005-07-26  4:34   ` John Belmonte
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-04 20:32 John Belmonte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42CFDF41.3040504@neggie.net \
    --to=john@neggie.net \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=paul.devriendt@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox