From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: A van Staalduijnen <cpufreq@toptracker.com>
Subject: Chipset dependant?
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:14:10 +0200
Message-ID: <44DD0132.8040205@toptracker.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk

At home I am running an old desktop box, running an Athlon XP on the old 
VIA KT133 (not KT133A) chipset. Since this box is mostly idle I am 
considering doing the old Athlon bridge hack, to turn the cpu into an 
Athlon XP-M, thinking I could be using cpufreq then, in order 
dynamically scale it's frequency.

I wonder though if it would suffice to turn the cpu into a 'mobile', or 
if it would require to have a different chipset on the motherboard as well.

Any chance cpufreq will work after modding the CPU on this motherboard, 
or would it be useless?


Thanks,

Arjan