From: "Rafał Bilski" <rafalbilski@interia.pl>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Wander Winkelhorst <w.winkelhorst@gmail.com>,
David Johnson <dj@david-web.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 11:23:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <463D9E8E.8040500@interia.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705060959200.23047@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
> <6>No local APIC present or hardware disabled
> <7>mapped APIC to ffffd000 (011ea000)
> <5>Local APIC not detected. Using dummy APIC emulation.
I/O APIC is very bad thing with Longhaul, but You don't have
local APIC, so it shouldn't be used.
> <6>ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
Looks like it isn't.
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKA] (IRQs *20), disabled.
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKB] (IRQs *21)
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKC] (IRQs *22)
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKD] (IRQs *23), disabled.
This is pointing to I/O APIC, but I don't see later that
such high interrupts are used. And if I/O APIC would be in
use You would have lockup in the moment of transition.
I was suspecting:
> One of the 2.6.21 regressions was Guilherme's problem seeing his box
> lock up when the system detected an unstable TSC and dropped back to
> using the HPET.
>
> In digging deeper, we found the HPET is not actually incrementing on
> this system. And in fact, the reason why this issue just cropped up was
> because of Thomas's clocksource watchdog code was comparing the TSC to
> the HPET (which wasn't moving) and thought the TSC was broken.
because I know that VT8237 has HPET built in. But I don't see any lines
starting with "hpet: enabled" or something similar. But I don't know
what to search for. I didn't have contact with HPET earlier.
It is very similar and Your problem with ondemand is starting right
after
> May 3 19:17:22 cn kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -136422685
> ns)
I don't see such message as long as "performance" governor is used.
Anyway adding "hpet=disable" at boot should confirm for sure that it
isn't it. And I think that John already ruled this out by
clocksource=acpi_pm.
Sorry
Rafa³
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Linda jako gospodyni domowa - zobacz!!!
>>> http://link.interia.pl/f1a79
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-06 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-04 10:16 cpufreq longhaul locks up Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 11:36 ` Wander Winkelhorst
2007-05-04 11:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 17:08 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 17:42 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-04 18:40 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 18:08 ` Wander Winkelhorst
2007-05-04 19:00 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 18:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 20:11 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 21:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 20:37 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 21:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 22:49 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 23:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 4:03 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 8:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 13:58 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 22:20 ` David Johnson
2007-05-04 23:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 5:40 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 8:44 ` Wander Winkelhorst
2007-05-05 14:02 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 17:48 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 19:58 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 20:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 20:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 21:32 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06 7:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06 5:12 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06 8:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06 9:23 ` Rafał Bilski [this message]
2007-05-06 9:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06 10:25 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06 11:33 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06 12:20 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 9:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 14:10 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 17:38 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 18:04 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:23 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=463D9E8E.8040500@interia.pl \
--to=rafalbilski@interia.pl \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dj@david-web.co.uk \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w.winkelhorst@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox