cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafał Bilski" <rafalbilski@interia.pl>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Wander Winkelhorst <w.winkelhorst@gmail.com>,
	David Johnson <dj@david-web.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 11:23:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <463D9E8E.8040500@interia.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705060959200.23047@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>

> <6>No local APIC present or hardware disabled
> <7>mapped APIC to ffffd000 (011ea000)
> <5>Local APIC not detected. Using dummy APIC emulation.
I/O APIC is very bad thing with Longhaul, but You don't have 
local APIC, so it shouldn't be used.
> <6>ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
Looks like it isn't.
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKA] (IRQs *20), disabled.
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKB] (IRQs *21)
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKC] (IRQs *22)
> <4>ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKD] (IRQs *23), disabled.
This is pointing to I/O APIC, but I don't see later that 
such high interrupts are used. And if I/O APIC would be in 
use You would have lockup in the moment of transition.

I was suspecting:
> One of the 2.6.21 regressions was Guilherme's problem seeing his box
> lock up when the system detected an unstable TSC and dropped back to
> using the HPET.
> 
> In digging deeper, we found the HPET is not actually incrementing on
> this system. And in fact, the reason why this issue just cropped up was
> because of Thomas's clocksource watchdog code was comparing the TSC to
> the HPET (which wasn't moving) and thought the TSC was broken.
because I know that VT8237 has HPET built in. But I don't see any lines 
starting with "hpet: enabled" or something similar. But I don't know 
what to search for. I didn't have contact with HPET earlier.
It is very similar and Your problem with ondemand is starting right 
after
> May  3 19:17:22 cn kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -136422685 
> ns)
I don't see such message as long as "performance" governor is used. 

Anyway adding "hpet=disable" at boot should confirm for sure that it 
isn't it. And I think that John already ruled this out by 
clocksource=acpi_pm.

Sorry 
Rafa³

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Linda jako gospodyni domowa - zobacz!!!
>>> http://link.interia.pl/f1a79

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-06  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-04 10:16 cpufreq longhaul locks up Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 11:36 ` Wander Winkelhorst
2007-05-04 11:51   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 17:08 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 17:42   ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-04 18:40     ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 18:08   ` Wander Winkelhorst
2007-05-04 19:00     ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 18:48   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 20:11     ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-04 21:03       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 20:37 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 21:02   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 22:49     ` john stultz
2007-05-04 23:32       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05  4:03         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05  8:00           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 13:58             ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:13               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-04 22:20 ` David Johnson
2007-05-04 23:37   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05  5:40     ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05  8:44       ` Wander Winkelhorst
2007-05-05 14:02         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 17:48         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:42           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 19:58             ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 20:30               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 20:50               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 21:32                 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06  7:53                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06  5:12                 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06  8:03                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06  9:23                     ` Rafał Bilski [this message]
2007-05-06  9:32                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06 10:25                         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-06 11:33                           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-06 12:20                             ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05  9:37       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 14:10         ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 17:38           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-05 18:04             ` Rafał Bilski
2007-05-05 18:23               ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=463D9E8E.8040500@interia.pl \
    --to=rafalbilski@interia.pl \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=dj@david-web.co.uk \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=w.winkelhorst@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox