From: J Webster <jw.jwebster@gmail.com>
To: Michael Reinelt <michael@reinelt.co.at>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPU throttled down to 800 after 15-30mins
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:17:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D52E832.9050803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D509E13.6090308@reinelt.co.at>
I have partially solved this by turning off speedstep in the BIOS.
Now the computer runs at 1.73 permanently.
Is there a way to get cpufreqd to control the speed after that and flip
between 800 and 1.73 as needed or is that a function completely
controlled by the BIOS?
ie now that I have max speed, I guess I have to leave it on max?
On 08/02/11 02:36, Michael Reinelt wrote:
> I had a similar problem back in 2007:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9488 In my case a broken
> BIOS was the reason. As I could not get a newer (fixed) BIOS, I found
> two workarounds: a) using the processor.ignore_ppc flag, and b) (the
> "final" solution): using a kernel parameter acpi_osi="!Windows 2006"
>
>
> Am 2011-02-07 23:56, schrieb J Webster:
>> The BIOS is BIOS revision A05, which has not been updated since 2005.
>> The BIOS only has settings to turn speedstep on or off. If it is turned
>> off then the computer will not run higher than 800MHz so that won't
>> solve the issue.
>> I have attached the results below when it throttles down to 800 and the
>> cpu limit says: 80000 but it starts off at 1733000.
>>
>> The only thing it could be is a temperature sensor that has gone faulty.
>> NHC in windows seems to be able to bypass this issue and ramp it up to
>> 1.73 but there doesn't seem to be an equivalent in Ubuntu that I know
>> of.
>>
>> when running at 1.73Ghz correctly:
>> j@j-Inspiron-9300:~$ date
>> Mon Feb 7 22:44:49 CET 2011
>> j@j-Inspiron-9300:~$ sudo cat
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/bios_limit
>> 1733000
>> j@j-Inspiron-9300:~$ cpufreq-info
>> cpufrequtils 007: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2009
>> Report errors and bugs to cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, please.
>> analyzing CPU 0:
>> driver: acpi-cpufreq
>> CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0
>> CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
>> maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
>> hardware limits: 800 MHz - 1.73 GHz
>> available frequency steps: 1.73 GHz, 1.33 GHz, 1.07 GHz, 800 MHz
>> available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace,
>> powersave, performance
>> current policy: frequency should be within 1.73 GHz and 1.73 GHz.
>> The governor "performance" may decide which speed to use
>> within this range.
>> current CPU frequency is 1.73 GHz.
>> cpufreq stats: 1.73 GHz:99.46%, 1.33 GHz:0.00%, 1.07 GHz:0.00%, 800
>> MHz:0.54% (16)
>>
>> when limited to 800MHz:
>> j@j-Inspiron-9300:~$ date
>> Mon Feb 7 23:54:45 CET 2011
>> j@j-Inspiron-9300:~$ cpufreq-info
>> cpufrequtils 007: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2009
>> Report errors and bugs to cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, please.
>> analyzing CPU 0:
>> driver: acpi-cpufreq
>> CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0
>> CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
>> maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
>> hardware limits: 800 MHz - 1.73 GHz
>> available frequency steps: 1.73 GHz, 1.33 GHz, 1.07 GHz, 800 MHz
>> available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace,
>> powersave, performance
>> current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 800 MHz.
>> The governor "performance" may decide which speed to use
>> within this range.
>> current CPU frequency is 800 MHz.
>> cpufreq stats: 1.73 GHz:69.73%, 1.33 GHz:0.00%, 1.07 GHz:0.00%, 800
>> MHz:30.27% (17)
>> j@j-Inspiron-9300:~$ sudo cat
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/bios_limit
>> 800000
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/02/11 20:55, Thomas Renninger wrote:
>>> On Sunday 06 February 2011 05:41:23 Mattia Dongili wrote:
>>>> Note that this is a kernel development related list, if your
>>>> problem is
>>>> specific to cpufreqd (note the "d" for deamon, a userspace
>>>> application)
>>>> please write/reply to me only or to cpufreqd related mailing lists.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:56:26PM +0100, J Webster wrote:
>>>>> My laptop is an Inpsiron 9300, which should be able to go up to
>>>>> 1.73GHz.
>>>>> I am having an issue whereby when I first turn the computer on,
>>>>> ondemand is selected and the speed moves between 800 and 1.73
>>>>> successfully.
>>>>> For no apparent reason, after 15mins it is throttled back to 800 and
>>>>> I cannot change it back.
>>>>> I tired manually editing the scaling_max_freq file to 1733000 but
>>>>> when I go back to view it it has changed to 800000 again!
>>>>> I thought it might be this issue:
>>>>> ##
>>>>> # Special Rules
>>>>> ##
>>>>> # CPU Too hot!
>>>>> [Rule]
>>>>> name=CPU Too Hot
>>>>> acpi_temperature=55-100
>>>>> cpu_interval=50-100
>>>>> profile=Performance Low
>>>>> [/Rule]
>>>>>
>>>>> So I changed it from 70-100 but on the last try the cpu did not
>>>>> reach 70 and it still throttled it back to 800.
>>>> Try to increase cpufreqd verbosity, it will tell you which and why a
>>>> specific rule was selected. From there you can work on modifying your
>>>> rules to better match your usage.
>>> Also check whether your BIOS is the reason, if you get 800000 here:
>>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/bios_limit
>>> you should check your BIOS settings.
>>>
>>> Thomas
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-05 19:56 CPU throttled down to 800 after 15-30mins J Webster
2011-02-06 4:41 ` Mattia Dongili
2011-02-07 19:55 ` Thomas Renninger
2011-02-07 21:41 ` Mattia Dongili
2011-02-07 22:56 ` J Webster
2011-02-08 1:36 ` Michael Reinelt
2011-02-08 7:50 ` J Webster
2011-02-08 11:22 ` J Webster
2011-02-09 19:17 ` J Webster [this message]
2011-02-09 19:37 ` Thomas Renninger
2011-02-09 19:43 ` J Webster
2011-02-09 19:50 ` Thomas Renninger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D52E832.9050803@gmail.com \
--to=jw.jwebster@gmail.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malattia@linux.it \
--cc=michael@reinelt.co.at \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox