public inbox for cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* New governor?
@ 2013-01-23 19:07 Jacob Shin
  2013-01-23 19:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Shin @ 2013-01-23 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki, cpufreq

Rafael, cpufreq list,

I was wondering ..

- Is hardware architecture specific governor acceptable in upstream?
  i.e. drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_amd_governor.c

If not ..

- Is it acceptable to patch ondemand and/or conservative governors to
  call into some hardware achitecture specific function that affects
  the governors's freqency change decisions? (of course it would only
  be avaiable on certain hardware and only kicks in if user wants it
  to)

Basically, we have some AMD specific processor registers that tell us
information that could help in making frequency change decisions for
better power savings, and I was wondering what the proper way to go
about implementing something like this would be.

Thanks!

-Jacob


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-23 20:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-23 19:07 New governor? Jacob Shin
2013-01-23 19:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-23 20:42   ` David C Niemi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox