From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: assign cpu_dev correctly to cpu0 device Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:55:46 +0100 Message-ID: <52303012.3060709@arm.com> References: <1378835989-19281-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <1378835989-19281-2-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski , Sudeep KarkadaNagesha , Shawn Guo , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 11/09/13 09:42, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 11 September 2013 13:45, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> Noone else seems to complain, but I don't think these =20, =09 etc. codes >> have been invented on my side and I don't think they belong here. I'm >> handling enough mails / patches daily to believe, that my mail system >> isn't the cause of this. Could you please verify and regenerate and >> resend? Unless I'm mistaken this looks like a corruption on your SMTP >> side. > > Its on Sudeep's side :) .. Or on ARM's side.. > Don't know why nobody else complained, Atleast people who test these > patches (Like Shawn), must have applied them from mail.. Don't know > why they aren't shouting :) > > He mostly send pull requests to Rafael and so this wasn't a issue for > Rafael :) > Yes looks like its at my end. I will try to fix it. There is alternate SMTP which should not have this issue, but it was down recently. I forgot to switch back to it once it was fixed. For now you can fetch it from: git://linux-arm.org/linux-skn.git cpufreq_fixes_v3.12 Regards, Sudeep