From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: fixes for v3.12 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:18:00 +0100 Message-ID: <523178B8.8020806@arm.com> References: <1378835989-19281-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <1795989.18GOYqdUtX@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1795989.18GOYqdUtX@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha , Shawn Guo , Guennadi Liakhovetski , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Viresh Kumar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 11/09/13 23:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 06:59:45 PM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha >> >> Hi Shawn, Guennadi, >> >> These are the fixes for the issue reported by Guennadi. >> cpu_dev should point to cpu0 device instead of cpufreq-cpu0 platform >> devices. The dev_id is also updated while registering the cpu clocks. >> >> Can you review these ? Tested-by is much appreciated as I don't >> have hardware to check the fix. > > I have a little problem with this series, because the last patch is based > on the current Linus' tree rather than on my master branch which is what > I have ready to push. I don't think it makes sense to rebase it, however, > because that would introduce a merge conflict for Linus unnecessarily. > > To avoid merging stuff back and forth, I'll push this series later in the > cycle. > Thanks Rafael. Let me know in case if you need me to rebase onto your branch. Regards, Sudeep