Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra20 cpufreq driver

bilhuang
2013-12-20T10:42:35Z

On 12/20/2013 06:33 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 December 2013 15:55, bilhuang <bilhuang@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> Don't you think it worth creating a file here so this can be shared to
>> arm64?
>
> We will see how to handle virtual devices when we will start getting
> arm64 SoCs. Probably we might end up writing a single file in cpufreq,
> if required, that will create virtual devices for every arm64 platform..
>
> So, some people might use it and others wouldn't.. But no platform
> specific files for such stuff. So, the best we can do for now is to move
> these to platform code as we are talking about arm32 SoC's for now
> which do have a mach-* directory..
>
OK thanks, this is suggested by Stephen earlier, I'll let him comment in
case he might think otherwise.