From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:27:01 +0000 Message-ID: <531F0115.4000109@arm.com> References: <1393208877-15797-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1393208877-15797-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Mark Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Sudeep Holla , Mark Brown , Viresh Kumar , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "rob.herring@linaro.org" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Hi Mark, Sorry for late response, looks like Rafael has pulled this change, but ... On 24/02/14 02:27, Mark Brown wrote: > From: Rob Herring > > Enable cpufreq and power kconfig menus on arm64 along with arm cpufreq > drivers. The power menu is needed for OPP support. At least on Calxeda > systems, the same cpufreq driver is used for arm and arm64 based > systems. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index fea7b47..939e95a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -327,6 +327,14 @@ source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig" > > endmenu > > +menu "Power management options" > + > +source "kernel/power/Kconfig" > + > +source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig" > + > +endmenu > + Is this patch based on recent kernels ? If so, either it should have caused conflicts or silently duplicated the entries. "Power management options" are already present. Also to be more consistent it with menu options, I would prefer this to be placed under "CPU Power Management" like CPUIdle. Regards, Sudeep