From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support cpufreq driver for Exynos3250 Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:51:16 +0200 Message-ID: <53527F54.5020601@gmail.com> References: <1397787634-9334-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3A+MbDV9U+uPj1xvUNTMsLweaLAW84LpUNvgzURsnB4=; b=nUVvEXvbU1XTW8WYV4f+vGYW/hYZ/3qCVDv+wPi8fguOe8a0kn7bBU2V+GXfW98nmX vk9/KEufrPNcof8Xi/2n4iHlBTH7Nz9IbUvkEyLhHBN8TvdsAV2zcDNtNoGfIhdoP68I 9iNIXjfI5PEP0rozv6fyl6FTTvqguHUB1afxoTIhbmf4PQKdDqEdgDjOJHwht1FsSrie UwnsFKu/pVL3f6hvuMJtfASpMOcYAZebU4HHJu1Kk4yquKw70luyG6w822oODDXJvQuJ SeAdrTBamNc6W+LKCywXmR6lgPY5gwCSXjxkRDwYuS93o01CQtb1LjzEYdybJwsGzixi e1NA== In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Chanwoo Choi , Sachin Kamat Cc: Chanwoo Choi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Kukjin Kim , Kyungmin Park , LKML , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel , linux-samsung-soc , Thomas Abraham Hi Chanwoo, Sachin, On 19.04.2014 15:43, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> Hi Chanwoo, >> >> On 18 April 2014 07:50, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> This patchset support cpufreq driver for Exynos3250 which uses the Cortex-A7 >>> dual cores and has a target speed of 1.0 GHz and code clean using dev_err/info >>> instead of pr_err/info function. >> >> Per SoC cpufreq driver which does not use CCF is no more encouraged for new >> Exynos platforms. Thomas has already posted patches to make use of >> generic cpu freq driver >> on Exynos platforms. Please refer to [1] and try to utilize it for >> this platform as well. >> >> [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/26886 > > OK, I'll refer to this new patch for cpufreq and rebase it. > > Thanks for your reply. The last version posted by Thomas still had several comments to be addressed that could lead to quite big changes in the whole design in next version. According to the information from Thomas, the work on it is in progress and we should see updated patchset soon. Best regards, Tomasz