From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mascha Kurpicz Subject: Re: time_in_state on Ubuntu 13.10 Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 14:08:09 +0200 Message-ID: <53677F29.2090905@unine.ch> References: <535E6906.2090201@unine.ch> <535F51F7.5090804@unine.ch> <535F6508.5020202@unine.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Linux PM list , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Maxime Colmant On 05/02/2014 07:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 29 April 2014 14:08, Mascha Kurpicz wrote: >> On 04/29/2014 10:26 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> On 29 April 2014 12:47, Mascha Kurpicz wrote: >>>> Sorry for the imprecision. >>>> >>>> Works correctly with >>>> Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS - kernel 3.2.0-29-generic >>>> Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS - kernel 3.8.0-29 >>>> Ubuntu 13.10 - kernel 3.8.0-29-generic >>>> >>>> 0 or very small (e.g. 6) values with >>>> Ubuntu 13.10 - kernel 3.11.0-20-generic >>> Can you provide cpufreq-info 's output for the last two cases please? > Sorry, got distracted and just forgot about this thread :), must have marked > it in my pending list :( > > Anyways, I have tried to look at the diff between these kernel releases and > looks like I couldn't figure out what's going wrong. > > I tried to test things with the latest kernel and they seem to be working fine. > Atleast on my ARM board. > > Would it be possible for you to do a git bisect between 3.8 and 3.11 ? We just tested with the latest release (14.04) and realized that the issue was already fixed for the latest kernel version, sorry about that! https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/7/119 Thanks anyways for your support :-) > -- > viresh