From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:02:51 +0530 Message-ID: <537C9CF3.60503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20140505072129.14454.25747.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <5367553C.1040701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5367553C.1040701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Meelis Roos , rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Cc: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/05/2014 02:39 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > On 05/05/2014 02:23 PM, Meelis Roos wrote: >>> >>> Changes in v3: >>> Expanded the comment in the code to briefly mention why ASYNC_NOTIFICATION >>> drivers are left out from the check, as suggested by Gautham R. Shenoy. >>> No code changes in this version. >>> >>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/283 >>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/28/469 >> >> Seems to work on VIA EPIA with 3.15-rc2 (no other cpufreq fixes): >> > > Great! Thanks a lot for testing this! > > Rafael/Viresh, can you please add Meelis' Tested-by while taking > this patch? Rafael, any thoughts on this patch? It has been Acked by Viresh and tested by Meelis. Hope you'll consider picking up this patch for 3.16. Thank you! Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat