From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:18:14 +0530 Message-ID: <537CA08E.4050608@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20140505072129.14454.25747.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <5367553C.1040701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <537C9CF3.60503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6424313.K1VhKnAUr2@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6424313.K1VhKnAUr2@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Meelis Roos , viresh.kumar@linaro.org, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/21/2014 06:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 06:02:51 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> On 05/05/2014 02:39 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >>> On 05/05/2014 02:23 PM, Meelis Roos wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v3: >>>>> Expanded the comment in the code to briefly mention why ASYNC_NOTIFICATION >>>>> drivers are left out from the check, as suggested by Gautham R. Shenoy. >>>>> No code changes in this version. >>>>> >>>>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/283 >>>>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/28/469 >>>> >>>> Seems to work on VIA EPIA with 3.15-rc2 (no other cpufreq fixes): >>>> >>> >>> Great! Thanks a lot for testing this! >>> >>> Rafael/Viresh, can you please add Meelis' Tested-by while taking >>> this patch? >> >> Rafael, any thoughts on this patch? >> >> It has been Acked by Viresh and tested by Meelis. Hope you'll consider >> picking up this patch for 3.16. > > It should be in linux-next today AFAICS. > Oops, I did check your tree before asking, but I'm not sure how I missed this. Now I'm able to see the patch in your bleeding-edge branch. Sorry for the noise! Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat