cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mason <mpeg.blue@free.fr>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	cpufreq <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage?
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:52:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5474FA1F.50603@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohponats3ZNqaRq+2ff4Vd=iMZHVy17Vs1K+Zmc_D47Br2+A@mail.gmail.com>

On 25/11/2014 16:19, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> On 25 November 2014 at 18:32, Mason <mpeg.blue@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> As far as I can tell, on my SoC, the timer runs at 27 MHz.
>> But I have no idea how often it fires an interrupt.
> 
> 27 MHz is the freq it runs at, but we get interrupt based on the value
> programmed in the timer counter.
> 
> Look for CONFIG_HZ in your .config, that will tell you number of ticks
> you are getting per second.
> 
> But cpufreq works in another level and so it doesn't depend on both
> these.

If I remember correctly (please correct me if I am mistaken),
the kernel keeps a list of timers, ordered by deadline, and
dynamically configures the system timer to fire at the next
deadline.

> Look for: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/sampling_rate
> this is the rate at which cpufreq core checks if cpu's freq require revisiting.

I think setting the sampling rate to 50 ms should make the
system reactive enough to load swings?

>> This 'struct clk' is an elusive beast.
>> Where is it defined? I only run into forward declarations.
> 
> Its architecture specific. What's the architecture you are working on?
> You may implement your own routine instead of cpufreq_generic_get().

The SoC is made by Sigma Designs. It is based on the ARM Cortex-A9.

> Yes. Documentation/clk.txt.

Oh boy! platform, device tree, cpu-freq, cpuidle, clk, ... so much
to learn, so few hours in a day.

> Yeah. You should be able to get some call from your architecture.

OK, I have to fix that function along with the cpufreq update.

Regards.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-25 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-19 23:24 How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage? Mason
2014-11-20  9:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-20 14:20   ` Mason
2014-11-21  3:36     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-25 13:02       ` Mason
2014-11-25 15:19         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-25 21:52           ` Mason [this message]
2014-11-26  4:14             ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5474FA1F.50603@free.fr \
    --to=mpeg.blue@free.fr \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox