From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:53:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871u0po0gx.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878uuxquxu.fsf@nemi.mork.no> ("Bjørn Mork"'s message of "Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:24:45 +0100")
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> writes:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
>
>> OK, thanks! Well, this is somewhat worrisome.
>>
>> Could you also check the linux-pm.git/fixes branch that contains all patches
>> I'm planning to push for 3.13-rc7 shortly?
>
> It's definitely still there. But I'm less sure about the exact trigger.
I did a couple of more tests after clean reboots, and 100% sure ways to
trigger the circular locking on my laptop are
echo ondemand > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
s2disk
or
echo 1401000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
s2disk
or
echo 1401000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
s2disk
Note that "ondemand" and "1401000" are the default vaules, so I don't
actually change anything here. The write is causing the problem, not
the value. As expected, I guess.
Also note that boot vs non-boot cpu doesn't seem to matter. Nor does
cancelling the hibernation. The warning appears on hibernate - not on
resume.
Hope this helps.
Bjørn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-03 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-24 1:41 [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume Viresh Kumar
2013-12-24 1:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: preserve user_policy across suspend/resume Viresh Kumar
2013-12-26 1:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-26 2:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-27 9:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-27 9:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-30 16:40 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-01-02 12:15 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-01-03 0:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-03 9:24 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-01-03 9:53 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2014-01-03 11:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-01-03 11:55 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-01-06 6:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-01-06 9:01 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-01-06 9:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-01-06 10:49 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-01-06 10:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-01-06 11:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <8738l15pht.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
2014-01-08 5:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-01-06 11:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871u0po0gx.fsf@nemi.mork.no \
--to=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox