From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: [Bug 11170] New: 2.6.24 w/ nohz=off runs cooler than 2.6.25 tickless
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:09:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-11170-3570@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11170
Summary: 2.6.24 w/ nohz=off runs cooler than 2.6.25 tickless
Product: Power Management
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25.12-62.fc8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Fedora
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: cpufreq
AssignedTo: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
ReportedBy: theholyettlz@googlemail.com
Latest working kernel version: 2.6.24.7-92.fc8
Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.25
Distribution: Fedora 8
Hardware Environment: Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 on Clevo M720R notebook
Software Environment: i686
Problem Description:
Kernel 2.6.24.7 runs cooler on this machine, even when booted "nohz=off", than
Kernel 2.6.25.* in tickless mode. The difference, in both coretemp and ACPI
thermal zone, is typically 4-6 C. This is all the more odd since 2.6.25 seems
to better support ACPI features like the lid and sleep button, which were
detected under 2.6.24 but didn't generate events, and the "smart power" button
which limits the clock to 1.2 GHz. [I'm booting "nohz=off" due to another
problem whereby the machine seems to "pause" (*not* freeze) when there are few
interrupts happening.]
Under 2.6.24.7, powertop reports 100% "C0 (cpu running)" residency, just
altering the clock rate, and around 100-200 wups. With 2.6.25.12, it shows two
C0 states, "C0 (cpu running)" and just "C0"; the residency figures don't make
much sense, and I suspect powertop is reporting garbage in both cases
(sometimes things like 8 wups). Furthermore, I don't really understand what I
see in /proc/acpi/processor/*/power --- with 2.6.24.7, only C1 shows any usage,
and the number keeps resetting after a few seconds. With 2.6.25.12, C1--C3 show
some usage, again with the numbers resetting.
Another thing (I don't know if it's related) is that under 2.6.25.12, I get the
following in dmesg:
ACPI Exception (thermal-0457): AE_ERROR, ACPI thermal trip point state
changed
I also see a lot of
ACPI: Invalid passive threshold
in dmesg for 2.6.24.7 if I cold-boot 2.6.25.12 first. Furthermore, cold-booting
2.6.25.12 and then re-booting into 2.6.24.7 makes the lid work under the
latter.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-27 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-27 12:09 bugme-daemon [this message]
2008-07-27 13:14 ` [Bug 11170] 2.6.24 w/ nohz=off runs cooler than 2.6.25 tickless bugme-daemon
2008-07-28 10:56 ` bugme-daemon
2008-07-30 13:35 ` bugme-daemon
2008-07-30 13:35 ` bugme-daemon
2008-07-30 13:36 ` bugme-daemon
2008-08-04 5:58 ` bugme-daemon
2008-08-04 5:58 ` bugme-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-11170-3570@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).