From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 11170] New: 2.6.24 w/ nohz=off runs cooler than 2.6.25 tickless Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11170 Summary: 2.6.24 w/ nohz=off runs cooler than 2.6.25 tickless Product: Power Management Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: 2.6.25.12-62.fc8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: cpufreq AssignedTo: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk ReportedBy: theholyettlz@googlemail.com Latest working kernel version: 2.6.24.7-92.fc8 Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.25 Distribution: Fedora 8 Hardware Environment: Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 on Clevo M720R notebook Software Environment: i686 Problem Description: Kernel 2.6.24.7 runs cooler on this machine, even when booted "nohz=off", than Kernel 2.6.25.* in tickless mode. The difference, in both coretemp and ACPI thermal zone, is typically 4-6 C. This is all the more odd since 2.6.25 seems to better support ACPI features like the lid and sleep button, which were detected under 2.6.24 but didn't generate events, and the "smart power" button which limits the clock to 1.2 GHz. [I'm booting "nohz=off" due to another problem whereby the machine seems to "pause" (*not* freeze) when there are few interrupts happening.] Under 2.6.24.7, powertop reports 100% "C0 (cpu running)" residency, just altering the clock rate, and around 100-200 wups. With 2.6.25.12, it shows two C0 states, "C0 (cpu running)" and just "C0"; the residency figures don't make much sense, and I suspect powertop is reporting garbage in both cases (sometimes things like 8 wups). Furthermore, I don't really understand what I see in /proc/acpi/processor/*/power --- with 2.6.24.7, only C1 shows any usage, and the number keeps resetting after a few seconds. With 2.6.25.12, C1--C3 show some usage, again with the numbers resetting. Another thing (I don't know if it's related) is that under 2.6.25.12, I get the following in dmesg: ACPI Exception (thermal-0457): AE_ERROR, ACPI thermal trip point state changed I also see a lot of ACPI: Invalid passive threshold in dmesg for 2.6.24.7 if I cold-boot 2.6.25.12 first. Furthermore, cold-booting 2.6.25.12 and then re-booting into 2.6.24.7 makes the lid work under the latter. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.