From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 65501] Blind angle of 1% between up_threshold and down_threshold
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:14:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65501-12968-MQkHaQr0mO@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65501-12968@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65501
--- Comment #7 from sworddragon2@aol.com ---
> I don't think it ever had it. I checked 2.6.30 and 3.0.. they don't have it. :)
Very interestingly.
> No, that's not right. We will go to max frequency if load has increased over up_threshold, otherwise freq will be proportional to load.
Thanks, this makes things much clearer (especially if I think on another
report). This will now leave a simple question: Why is
MIN_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD not 1?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 14:53 [Bug 65501] New: Blind angle of 1% between up_threshold and down_threshold bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-26 21:43 ` [Bug 65501] " bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-11 8:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 6:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 10:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 10:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 11:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 11:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 12:14 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2013-12-18 14:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 14:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 14:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 14:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 15:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-18 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-19 1:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-19 10:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-19 10:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-18 3:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-06-03 5:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-11-10 22:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-12-24 13:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-12-24 23:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-12-28 2:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-65501-12968-MQkHaQr0mO@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).