From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 75121] New: Intel Pstate driver - powersave mode - CPU
frequency too low
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 23:47:53 +0000
Message-ID:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75121
Bug ID: 75121
Summary: Intel Pstate driver - powersave mode - CPU frequency
too low
Product: Power Management
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.15rc3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: cpufreq
Assignee: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Reporter: dsmythies@telus.net
Regression: No
Until recently, the difference between the intel_pstate driver in performance
mode verses powersave mode was minimal to imperceptible. Now, the frequency
response (meaning the rate of load / noload on a CPU) is drastically different
than it used to be and often not even as good as the acpi-cpufreq driver in
ondemand mode.
This is a negative side effect from Commit fcb6a15c2e7e - intel_pstate: Take
core C0 time into account for core busy calculation.
I can revert to the same performance as previously for the intel_pstate driver
in powersave mode by changing one line in the code (kernel = 3.15rc3-doug on
the graphs). From this:
sample->core_pct_busy = mul_fp(core_pct, c0_pct);
to this:
sample->core_pct_busy = core_pct;
basically, reverting the commit.
There has been other bug reports and threads:
References:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70941
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66581
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/19/626
In a moment, I will add 3 attachment graphs that detail the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.