From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:36:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D77201 --- Comment #87 from Mauro --- (In reply to Viresh Kumar from comment #86) > Only one of these two will work for you. Check which one, I would put= my 10 > cents on *-post1 branch :) You should have bet more, *-post2 hangs, *-post1 works. > Once, any one of the branches work for you, try doing a git bisect fo= r that > branch and 3.14 (Only few revert patches actually, should be easy)..=20 >=20 > And you can tell me which revert patch has *fixed* the issue for you = and > that's the culprit. I had to skip the last step of the bisect as it fails to build, I'm att= aching the bisect log. It fails with: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c: In function =E2=80=98arch_perf_update= _userpage=E2=80=99: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c:1903:23: error: =E2=80=98CYC2NS_SCALE_= =46ACTOR=E2=80=99 undeclared (first use in this function) userpg->time_shift =3D CYC2NS_SCALE_FACTOR; ^ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c:1903:23: note: each undeclared identif= ier is reported only once for each function it appears in scripts/Makefile.build:308: recipe for target 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.o' failed make[3]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... CC kernel/printk/printk.o scripts/Makefile.build:455: recipe for target 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu' fai= led make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu] Error 2 scripts/Makefile.build:455: recipe for target 'arch/x86/kernel' failed make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2 Makefile:841: recipe for target 'arch/x86' failed make: *** [arch/x86] Error 2 >=20 > Then we can follow on LKML, will put you in CC, on the original commi= t > threads.. >=20 > Thanks for your dedication towards fixing this up, it was really a ni= ghtmare > to get down to this :) I'm just scratching my itch ;) I also have to thank you, and everyone e= lse that looked into this, it looks like this is not affecting many people and y= et you took the time and effort to track this down. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.