From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn_Mork?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:40:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5562479.pVWRuDL0y6@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="macroman" To: Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Lists linaro-kernel , Patch Tracking , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Yes, that's good. As you might have guessed by the lack of any response= , I won't be able to test this in 2013. Thanks for all the good work! Bj=C3=B8rn=20 Viresh Kumar wrote: >On 27 December 2013 15:27, Viresh Kumar >wrote: >> I think there is nothing much different in this patch compared to >what Bjorn >> tested. So you can probably push that now and let him test linux-nex= t >later >> once he is back? > >Just saw that you already pushed it. :)