From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Rychter Subject: Re: cpufreq and P-IIIM Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:02:29 -0700 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: References: <20030818112943.GD18032@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030818112943.GD18032@poupinou.org> (Ducrot Bruno's message of "Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:29:43 +0200") Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> "Ducrot" =3D=3D Ducrot Bruno : Ducrot> On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 01:28:11PM -0700, Jan Rychter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just tried the latest 2.4 snapshot of cpufreq. Unfortunately, >> it doesn't seem to work on my hardware. It says: >> >> cpufreq: Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) support $Revision: 1.7.2.6 $ >> cpufreq: Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) for this chipset not (yet) >> available. Ducrot> That version is way too old anyway. Huh? That was the latest 2.4 snapshot that I was able to pull from ftp.linux.org.uk: cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20030816.tar.bz2. If these are not the 'official' archives and the snapshots are outdated, I'd humbly suggest pulling them off the net, because it confuses people. I was pointed there to get my cpufreq for 2.4, after being referred to www.codemonkey.org.uk which has never worked for me in the last 3 weeks of trying. [...] Ducrot> Take a look at www.poupinou.org/cpufreq/ Thanks for the pointer. =2D-J. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQA/QQaqLth4/7/QhDoRAhmLAJiU0iKbLUY+9ZciYWjYoSUdpaGQAKCBvHGZ UQDkBi4V0nUxMLAYAVAMZA== =olqA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--