CRIU (Checkpoint/Restore in Userspace) mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	criu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: do_change_type(): refuse to operate on unmounted/not ours mounts
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250724230052.GW2580412@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANaxB-xXgW1FEj6ydBT2=cudTbP=fX6x8S53zNkWcw1poL=L2A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 01:02:48PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> Hi Al and Christian,
> 
> The commit 12f147ddd6de ("do_change_type(): refuse to operate on
> unmounted/not ours mounts") introduced an ABI backward compatibility
> break. CRIU depends on the previous behavior, and users are now
> reporting criu restore failures following the kernel update. This change
> has been propagated to stable kernels. Is this check strictly required?

Yes.

> Would it be possible to check only if the current process has
> CAP_SYS_ADMIN within the mount user namespace?

Not enough, both in terms of permissions *and* in terms of "thou
shalt not bugger the kernel data structures - nobody's priveleged
enough for that".

What the hell is CRIU trying to do there?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-24 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-24 20:02 do_change_type(): refuse to operate on unmounted/not ours mounts Andrei Vagin
2025-07-24 23:00 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-07-24 23:38   ` Andrei Vagin
2025-07-26 17:12   ` Andrei Vagin
2025-07-26 17:53     ` Al Viro
2025-07-26 21:01       ` Andrei Vagin
2025-07-31  2:40         ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2025-07-31  7:53           ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-31  8:11             ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2025-08-13 18:56         ` Al Viro
2025-08-13 19:09           ` Tycho Andersen
2025-08-13 19:41             ` Al Viro
2025-08-14  4:08               ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2025-08-14  4:42                 ` Al Viro
2025-08-14  5:51                   ` [PATCH][RFC][CFT] use uniform permission checks for all mount propagation changes Al Viro
2025-08-14  5:57                     ` [RFC][CFT] selftest for permission checks in " Al Viro
2025-08-14  6:37                       ` Al Viro
2025-08-14  7:07                 ` do_change_type(): refuse to operate on unmounted/not ours mounts Pavel Tikhomirov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250724230052.GW2580412@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=avagin@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=criu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox