From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
To: cryptsetup development <cryptsetup@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] cryptsetup 2.7.4
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:19:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26c3ffac-5291-4e4e-9d5a-5ea8b33fbb5e@gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3093 bytes --]
The cryptsetup 2.7.4 stable release is available at
https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup
Please note that release packages are located on kernel.org
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/cryptsetup/v2.7/
Feedback and bug reports are welcomed.
Cryptsetup 2.7.4 Release Notes
==============================
Stable bug-fix release.
All users of cryptsetup 2.7 should upgrade to this version.
Changes since version 2.7.3
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* Detect device busy failure for device-mapper table-referenced devices.
Some device-mapper ioctl failures can disappear in libdevmapper,
causing the libcryptsetup wrapper to return an invalid error (EINVAL)
instead of EEXIST or EBUSY. One such case is when there is a device
creation race, and the device-mapper device name is created, but
the following mapping table load fails. This can happen because some
block devices used in table mapping have already been claimed by
another process (the kernel needs exclusive access).
The kernel ioctl properly returns EBUSY; this errno is lost in
libdevmapper (dm_task_get_errno returns 0). It should be fixed by
libdevmapper in the future.
Such behavior was seen in the systemd way of handling dm-verity
devices. With these changes, the code should react for EEXIST and
EBUSY, as another process has already activated the device.
Code calling libcryptsetup also must not check the underlying device
with an exclusive open flag (O_EXCL). Otherwise, it could cause a race
in the kernel device-mapper, resulting in no process succeeding device
activation (see also CRYPT_ACTIVATE_SHARED flag below).
* Fix shared activation for dm-verity devices.
The CRYPT_ACTIVATE_SHARED flag was silently ignored when activating
dm-verity devices. Dm-verity shared activation is generally safe
since all verity devices are read-only.
The shared flag is a way to skip the exclusive access check for the
device, allowing it to create multiple mappings with the same device or
properly handle a racy concurrent activation of devices with the same
name from different processes.
* Add --shared option for veritysetup open action.
The option allows the data device to be used in multiple device-mapper
table mappings (skip exclusive access check) or to allow concurrent
dm-verity device activation of the same device (only one process
succeeds in this case; the other will return EEXIST or EBUSY).
* Do not use exclusive flag for the allocated backing loop files.
Using this flag is an undefined operation for opening an existing file.
The flag should be used only for allocated loop (block) devices.
* Fixes for problems found by static analyzers and Valgrind.
These include fixes for non-default libgcrypt, NSS, and Nettle
cryptographic backends, buffer operations to avoid partial read/write,
and several other workarounds for mostly false positive warnings.
* Fixes to tests and CI scripts.
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 4753 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26c3ffac-5291-4e4e-9d5a-5ea8b33fbb5e@gmail.com \
--to=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=cryptsetup@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox