From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 963CE1A254C; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740780576; cv=none; b=q6oizQmcDmpdocf1AznFf8Nkhpx5GfzLznHg91SJX4N0CatfHthbN/BNvcBQfBuLrVTeq/cK3pu4WoxSWgdgrCc1wxIxiUsXKaUUyD37/cEuvtG+dWUepDPz4U7yFiKJLPbSwlXnbazcKYDYRDcB4lBhZzdESIFjXM2wqzvsVk8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740780576; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GkIfcQPKP+rNfXmQzBlmCYKlx5Vw4LcFnlqzHPTotfM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=e09ywK+dE+MFuP7kgsl2MW3aIJJHtNwcHkr6J2j4BlVJBdjVHF19RVqSegpP5Y0P+yft1LRYoApdAkYg0ZpsOl6fnJCj/NGKvcY50KghmqxC94jLQ6X+RtknHxbMx3hiyUv+sXuVaXDpHr+iCmf/zKxgHJ2RSRZfmfMFFcq9tgU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fLL3tGHb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fLL3tGHb" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EC0BC4CED6; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:09:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740780576; bh=GkIfcQPKP+rNfXmQzBlmCYKlx5Vw4LcFnlqzHPTotfM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fLL3tGHb5kCCz68Qaghi6BzSATWGmAOtRKgOwxvfHTZHXVaqQzjFqhxnJkFUpPzfR /wm9Z5991omNsHbC29eEQdFoMkQlOe3g6toTu3uzL1uLWQMbFm96baQSJy9QiZ8A0i fjNQNxMVVF/XSRcrQ2IIYwCVsSgdMxel4S25dC9t4asQkyApHK9AnyfXPnjBlEI873 gHZ3cIjQGancQ1da7JKul/2upWisylp/UXJf64p8K1d4UuwCR5EgTa2jvAv8m1vC0e oj86Ay8ftWej0C+Ewsir1QsPGGWWPX/kwnbgU7XgUtzlkPOgrviop6C/dYLjOuO1pR l+j5p40HNYgcA== From: SeongJae Park To: SeongJae Park Cc: Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , damon@lists.linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] mm/damon: auto-tune aggregation interval Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:09:32 -0800 Message-Id: <20250228220932.50419-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250228220328.49438-1-sj@kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:03:20 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote: > DAMON requires time-consuming and repetitive aggregation interval > tuning. Introduce a feature for automating it using a feedback loop > that aims an amount of observed access events, like auto-exposing > cameras. [...] > Evaluation > ========== > > We confirmed the tuning works as expected with a few simple workloads > including kernel builds and an in-memory caching representative > benchmark[1]. Forgot adding the link to the benchmark, sorry. It is https://github.com/facebookresearch/DCPerf/blob/main/packages/tao_bench/README.md Thanks, SJ [...]