From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5AC419CC0C for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2026 00:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773447680; cv=none; b=o9onkyF8Aq/uToBcFxkJ++63l8QEMp8aJZlSkVieXYSp0vR95QyjVAIW4wLE5QNsaK12NB9WCWiOulE3MkkvM7fcIzfzLmNtvOx/0XvpmXb8dsesRHHnXdESyhgN9y4OI16dLUqXoCblBNuze6MbgbsqxIPfVCwcny5jbNhGkP0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773447680; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UJbfjXt9aVSOiW5buRYz/cMornZh+o9XMfOB8wS5ODw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DdrFxS5GG53vsEB480n0Fjuobb8e2ItyFEUpEASQufS4dW/chhx30uzzy1CBDgtJkyEwe35k7du1vX6B0y770ObNJifkSksagezf4IMXYu9VOzSzQKaSgVfspA64dcNvmOGJSvFG+WGZhvGM91qw48m1H0p+vjFe0WIYm1mxd5c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GlMnrYsf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GlMnrYsf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A9FFC19421; Sat, 14 Mar 2026 00:21:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773447680; bh=UJbfjXt9aVSOiW5buRYz/cMornZh+o9XMfOB8wS5ODw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GlMnrYsfkcmXiMzp0R9Fy9lNXxphl9+8SdFOUvmZBrJb7A5Yjy9BNtfgTWiXQEyvP 5XU3wmEKnGqzQ2CCTIQ8kc+cWYraMBJgUVR1DAGkrP4VKjUwdJg+GtzekpmvffYuAB 65CFALocwvsnhOTwOukU2smnhLdAgLznSpIGtUqfxH/VQetRYSuOZwFnp4N3d9crBN eW1edtyYB+u+/enfauhYREDy3OPqqlI2aaqwCnVnydA1rs13cU+SrfW2L9KQwXreBh meqOa07Gc0+u0tpXdzhDVrZ9ukUva90nUNAt14/9C0s8eITbdOZMqIvKjslcJhBQbT w/8fVKxQLRbsQ== From: SeongJae Park To: Liew Rui Yan Cc: SeongJae Park , damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [Question] mm/damon: conflict between DAMON_STAT and DAMON_LRU_SORT? Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:21:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20260314002119.79742-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sat, 14 Mar 2026 03:42:35 +0800 Liew Rui Yan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 10:52 PM SeongJae Park wrote: > > > > Yes. But, I think 'Special-Purpose Access-aware Kernel Modules' section of > > Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst is a better place to document it. > > > > Would you mind sending a patch for that? > > > > Hi SeongJae, > > Thank you so much for your quick and detailed reply! > > I'm happy to send a documentation patch for this. As you suggested, I'll > add the explanation to the "Special-Purpose Access-aware Kernel Modules" > section of Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst. > > Additionally, would it be helpful to add a short note with a :ref: > cross-reference in Documentation/admin-guide/mm/damon/lru_sort.rst > pointing to that section? I think this could help sysadmins quickly > understand the reason behind the -EBUSY error without having to dig deep > into the full design document. Yes, I think that will be helpful. Let's do so! > > I may need a few days to prepare the patch properly, I want to > familiarise myself with the reStructuredText syntax and the current > design.rst. I'll do my best to send it soon. Is that okay? That's perfectly fine. No rush, take your time :) > > Thanks again for your guidance and for maintaining DAMON! My pleasure! Thanks, SJ [...]