From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [RFC PATCH v5 01/11] mm/damon/core: handle <min_region_sz remaining quota as empty
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:32:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410233223.88212-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410142034.83798-2-sj@kernel.org>
TL; DR: sashiko found a good finding that better to be done as a separate
cleanup work. This patch still seems good to go as-is.
Forwarding sashiko review in a reply format with my inline
comments below, for details of my view and doing discussions
via mails if needed.
> # review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260410142034.83798-2-sj@kernel.org
> # start of sashiko.dev inline review
> commit 2ab7d52b1eb10efa95d43a8eee7c50fd9669d56d
> Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/core: handle <min_region_sz remaining quota as empty
>
> This commit updates the core DAMOS logic to consider a quota fully charged
> if the remaining quota is less than the minimum region size. This prevents
> actions from being applied too frequently to specific memory areas.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > index 12544c60531d3..8dbc365bb8e97 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -2127,8 +2140,7 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c,
> > continue;
> >
> > /* Check the quota */
> > - if (damos_quota_is_set(quota) &&
> > - quota->charged_sz >= quota->esz)
> > + if (damos_quota_is_full(quota, c->min_region_sz))
> > continue;
> >
> > if (damos_skip_charged_region(t, r, s, c->min_region_sz))
>
> With this new check skipping regions when the remaining quota is less than
> the minimum region size, does the truncation check in damos_apply_scheme()
> become unreachable?
>
> Because damon_do_apply_schemes() will now only call damos_apply_scheme()
> when quota->esz - quota->charged_sz >= c->min_region_sz, the ALIGN_DOWN
> calculation:
>
> damos_apply_scheme() {
> ...
> if (c->ops.apply_scheme) {
> if (damos_quota_is_set(quota) &&
> quota->charged_sz + sz > quota->esz) {
> sz = ALIGN_DOWN(quota->esz - quota->charged_sz,
> c->min_region_sz);
> if (!sz)
> goto update_stat;
> ...
> }
>
> will always result in a value greater than or equal to c->min_region_sz.
>
> Could the if (!sz) check and the corresponding goto update_stat be safely
> removed since sz can no longer evaluate to 0?
Good finding, but doing that would better to be a separate cleanup work. I
will add that to my todo list, but keep this patch as is.
>
>
> # end of sashiko.dev inline review
> # review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260410142034.83798-2-sj@kernel.org
Thanks,
SJ
# hkml [1] generated a draft of this mail. You can regenerate
# this using below command:
#
# hkml patch sashiko_dev --for_forwarding \
# 20260410142034.83798-2-sj@kernel.org
#
# [1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 14:20 [RFC PATCH v5 00/11] mm/damon: introduce DAMOS failed region quota charge ratio SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/11] mm/damon/core: handle <min_region_sz remaining quota as empty SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 23:32 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/11] mm/damon/core: merge quota-sliced regions back SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 23:55 ` (sashiko review) " SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/11] mm/damon/core: introduce failed region quota charge ratio SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 23:56 ` (sashiko review) " SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/11] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: implement fail_charge_{num,denom} files SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 23:58 ` (sashiko review) " SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/11] Docs/mm/damon/design: document fail_charge_{num,denom} SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/11] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document fail_charge_{num,denom} files SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/11] Docs/ABI/damon: document fail_charge_{num,denom} SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/11] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test fail_charge_{num,denom} committing SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/11] selftests/damon/_damon_sysfs: support failed region quota charge ratio SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/11] selftests/damon/drgn_dump_damon_status: " SeongJae Park
2026-04-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/11] selftests/damon/sysfs.py: test " SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260410233223.88212-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox