From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com (mail-pl1-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13989285CA2 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 04:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776400019; cv=none; b=Wyc0sdDm5tAEPuTWOIzJZyqM33g7mML00DVIIPgG0N3zEuWi7gBnWspebCUlmszSkVpFjIqHJ1baUryJIMI9yFk8PEroStqsIcLoh73F2ZFouyA1drGRiNOPf1mh6vE6OibNLUZdRC+A4cM3cvilp72n3cvOAXJ23hFgR4Wz0cQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776400019; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rzo3/lArtV5KZe4B53vpwZ2qNm0qXmGRIvm7UwEy+3w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=Se3cuGhd2kjq9Xd7jf5LDRIqCENtr5nBD7VVXj4Kn48mxwsU3M3b8bvzdypQ4xAkQ1i8V0lGNVHMJ6hluNS6SpnhtlxfyilO9Z/czoJpNA2lSRIAUWMECVASNac5ElpfVQ3xasB3wZU+zYSH3MdYs3G5CXXwfUOxgTYQocm6B3s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=d2dbNlWB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="d2dbNlWB" Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b24fede2acso1160745ad.3 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:26:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1776400017; x=1777004817; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=sdZwKg7ZqT6fpMDssi0ujHMgVQlDq6enJyNYdZyrVCA=; b=d2dbNlWBlfOzzg0dWxw+rnMrdYijjhu/jSSxpPUcUsufuoAE5nZIY6/CwDrG7SCY3X Lz0ncJhTfX01Jmo50F5MuRlnTn3RX3wvVhTOk7siMI3fJABpMDYft1XNSMDXIlSe+TPB XxlduWs1yLj8U6DM2r/rrn4No1EDdZxfcD4seKKS1uzpoK4CMuJk7OrMMRs5lfg47U25 VivqmbAbXjRurjXuSI0Cq8dv4pFIYmYbZ4kBuglwWNX/qPsCTAj8FNH7yH9RKjpLRxhN 6s8gcugIQft+C/ETlFjPcJTk0/iXg4q9rIM2dh05Q8lFvsjeYTG2Klnqwd6jGYVdsJd+ YlIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1776400017; x=1777004817; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sdZwKg7ZqT6fpMDssi0ujHMgVQlDq6enJyNYdZyrVCA=; b=OZ9KRT+zvTWeP9xVdNdd1nF5z6nMtr4SnpaBGtVVicb7fGSfP1DNdmhZEQuKq+NxE7 KnVZ/zyxV9EYEZCwyDqm+qgExxAkNVMtZqgXdcNrmvl3tf6hDdhLCghUpGqoSv6fZWcs g/ET1wxxcds7RPyBKsGvrO2c008DiA+loqUOY2GcpXHBExU8Cf7FgIxt+23bdIOBXdHm oTfy0zkzixcIh99UReMA47XKuD0KqZmPLk0/fSk+whPaMDjEsaGN7fL57qW/5cOw9+c7 +ckpFiombZ0/00WeIW6WaQNKoKSgomGjA9JEjUnZnIw804g92EGB8QA6MqGM+u/KJE47 Ddvg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ86cGPnniSvHZvdP51DzZ5yoaNRaLGMWmZLoFLlHs4/rQENqqU+d7p/Wth2XwGi3rDspyZQmg==@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzxBoGwu46jA3p9TTGUlmqxorAkLlqWyOjEasdULjD69+q8vaHo F0eRuPL3t9/Ny/1KIQKGX0gQNR7U4TwBmZd68hft4ZHQUEDIqN7spOf6 X-Gm-Gg: AeBDievyNa49MK8RFKJmOW0sRh0phGSIVP4g4H7GYjwlhBgG7uIay7nFE4SRsMKQ7CR +b8b2YeKQ6kl+hwyLJnt3MSocJBfsrxOgPMptEtjMR7mgN58tQvUbhqF7DkLVsQGcCTkG2Mk6Cz mU1g3RFkQCiGxxd7vcy3COv7Eu3X5KsDBgXEwx+6k1YBGGGS3dVSpmJ+QBimPsP9LVXrCJNyBDk mgtj2OfCVLdjsyTuCMOPwBRkgLz6b1mDlCwxEbCrgq7wnbskEuJxn0488VKOINNd5XKyLV7b5zY dc2I4Bh7wC+B7nqhNRKvsWcm0xpjB/mQd7jQarfdTpjFwAr1MPQcLvYhz0+pgKhBelJSWYnH2pt 2DSZFLWkHQzTUjp9QUoSAS1JVloprGM6qxXJLvuQk9GCMZbwd55nE8PyO6Nj5x8PWERlXjVW6Gc XKqlDYHIOhN7ihLsHbpXTIfZGqD+VodDYnnYiSW5QwDONhqCz3wxKq4REt6kwViYoWxQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:bd2:b0:2b2:ccfb:8387 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b5f9f534d9mr10448305ad.28.1776400017244; Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from celestia.taila51cc2.ts.net ([2402:1980:889a:1f39:d795:a77d:4309:e1bb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2b5fab0c17esm4928985ad.41.2026.04.16.21.26.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:26:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Liew Rui Yan To: sj@kernel.org Cc: aethernet65535@gmail.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/damon: reset thread status parameters upon kdamond termination Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:27:01 +0800 Message-ID: <20260417042701.4077-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260417011229.75947-1-sj@kernel.org> References: <20260417011229.75947-1-sj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 18:12:28 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote: > Maybe I suggested too much... If we decide to take both my suggested commit > description and the above change direction, maybe it is difficult to say you > are the main author who should be primarily responsible for any followup issues > on the patch. Of course you will still deserve to have credits. Maybe > 'Co-developed-by:'? Yes, I've decide to adopt both your suggested commit description and the implementation. Therefore, since you've done the most of the work, you should be the main author of this patch. > > Meanwhile, I feel like the fix of this bug is taking bit unnecessarily long > time... My apologies. I have had limited bandwidth recently. > > If you agree, hence, I'd like to take this over from this point, and finish up > the remaining works for this patch. If you also agree, I will also take the > responsibility (authorship) from you, while keeping keep your credits with > 'Co-developed-by:' tag. What do you think? I agree to hand over this patch to you. Thank you for your help. > > By the way, I hope I'm not making you to get me wrong. I'm not trying to steal > your credit (authorship). In my opinion the authorship means the > responsibility (or, who to blame) more than the credit. Putting right name to > the place for the responsibility is important for the long term maintenance and > evolvement of the community and the product (Linux) in my opinion, so I have to > say this. Thank you for your explanation. I understand your point that authorship implies responsibility, and since most of the core ideas for this patch came from you, I fully agree that you should be the main author. Best regards, Rui Yan