From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:14:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260418151438.787-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418045715.EAF7EC2BCB5@smtp.kernel.org>
On Sat, 18 Apr 2026 04:57:15 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
> - [Medium] Command-line override for the 'enabled' parameter is broken: passing 'enabled=N' after 'enabled=Y' fails to disable the module.
> --
>
> commit 6f46639cc34c6ddcbecc0aba915988dff8f651de
> Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values
>
> This commit updates DAMON_RECLAIM to dynamically query the running status
> of kdamond instead of relying on cached parameter values. This ensures
> that when kdamond stops unexpectedly, the enabled and kdamond_pid parameters
> reflect the correct state.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > index 86da147786583..46660c8d4d422 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -332,10 +316,16 @@ module_param_cb(addr_unit, &addr_unit_param_ops, &addr_unit, 0600);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(addr_unit,
> > "Scale factor for DAMON_RECLAIM to ops address conversion (default: 1)");
> >
> > +static bool damon_reclaim_enabled(void)
> > +{
> > + if (!ctx)
> > + return false;
> > + return damon_is_running(ctx);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int damon_reclaim_enabled_store(const char *val,
> > const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > {
> > - bool is_enabled = enabled;
> > bool enable;
> > int err;
> >
> > @@ -343,7 +333,7 @@ static int damon_reclaim_enabled_store(const char *val,
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> >
> > - if (is_enabled == enable)
> > + if (damon_reclaim_enabled() == enable)
> > return 0;
>
> Does changing this check break kernel command-line overrides during boot?
>
> During early boot when command-line parameters are parsed, ctx is not yet
> allocated, so damon_reclaim_enabled() unconditionally returns false.
>
> If a system has damon_reclaim.enabled=Y in the boot parameters and an
> administrator appends damon_reclaim.enabled=N to override it, the first
> evaluation correctly sets the internal enabled flag to true.
>
> However, when the second parameter (N) is processed, enable is false.
> Since damon_reclaim_enabled() also returns false, the condition matches
> and the function returns 0 immediately. The internal enabled variable is
> never updated to false, causing the module to start unexpectedly when
> damon_reclaim_init() runs.
>
> Should this keep checking the internal enabled variable during early boot?
I don't think such override is common, but I also think there is no harm at
making the old behavior be kept. I will address this like below, in the next
revision.
'''
--- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
+++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
@@ -381,27 +381,20 @@ static bool damon_reclaim_enabled(void)
static int damon_reclaim_enabled_store(const char *val,
const struct kernel_param *kp)
{
- bool enable;
int err;
- err = kstrtobool(val, &enable);
+ err = kstrtobool(val, &enabled);
if (err)
return err;
- if (damon_reclaim_enabled() == enable)
+ if (damon_reclaim_enabled() == enabled)
return 0;
/* Called before init function. The function will handle this. */
if (!damon_initialized())
- goto set_param_out;
-
- err = damon_reclaim_turn(enable);
- if (err)
- return err;
+ return 0;
-set_param_out:
- enabled = enable;
- return err;
+ return damon_reclaim_turn(enabled);
}
static int damon_reclaim_enabled_load(char *buffer,
'''
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-18 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-18 1:44 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm/damon/modules: detect and use fresh status SeongJae Park
2026-04-18 1:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values SeongJae Park
2026-04-18 4:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-18 15:14 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-04-18 1:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mm/damon/lru_sort: " SeongJae Park
2026-04-18 5:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-18 15:36 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-18 1:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mm/damon/stat: detect and use fresh enabled value SeongJae Park
2026-04-18 5:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-18 15:40 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260418151438.787-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox