DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiayuan Chen" <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/paddr: prefetch struct page of the next region
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 19:25:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260423192534.300CEC2BCB2@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423122340.138880-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [High] Unsafe use of `pfn_to_page()` on unvalidated PFNs causes kernel panic on SPARSEMEM configurations without VMEMMAP.
--

commit 8abf0dd953e91eace9153afe00585b922bbe2751
Author: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>

mm/damon/paddr: prefetch struct page of the next region

This commit introduces software prefetching for the next region's struct
page in DAMON's physical address mode to reduce cache misses. It uses
pfn_to_page() instead of pfn_to_online_page() to avoid the serialization
costs of looking up the memory section, expecting prefetchw() to safely
drop hints for unmapped addresses.

>   - pfn_to_page() rather than pfn_to_online_page(): on
>     CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP the former is pure arithmetic
>     (vmemmap + pfn), while the latter walks the mem_section table.  The
>     mem_section lookup itself incurs a DRAM miss for random PFNs, which
>     would serialize what is supposed to be a non-blocking hint - an
>     earlier attempt that used pfn_to_online_page() saw the prefetch
>     path's internal stall dominate perf (~91% skid on the converge
>     point after the call).  Prefetching an unmapped vmemmap entry is
>     safe: the hint is dropped without faulting.

Does this logic hold for systems using CONFIG_SPARSEMEM without VMEMMAP?

While it is true that pfn_to_page() is pure arithmetic on VMEMMAP, under
classic SPARSEMEM it requires a section lookup to evaluate.

> diff --git a/mm/damon/paddr.c b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> index b5e1197f2ba22..99bdf2b88cf19 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/paddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/paddr.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -48,10 +49,29 @@ static void damon_pa_mkold(phys_addr_t paddr)
>  	folio_put(folio);
>  }
>  
> +static void damon_pa_prefetch_page(unsigned long sampling_addr,
> +				   unsigned long addr_unit)
> +{
> +	phys_addr_t paddr = damon_pa_phys_addr(sampling_addr, addr_unit);
> +
> +	prefetchw(pfn_to_page(PHYS_PFN(paddr)));

Can this cause a kernel panic on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM configurations without
VMEMMAP?

In DAMON paddr mode, target regions can span physical memory holes. Since
damon_rand_fast() selects a random physical address, it might select an
unpopulated area.

If the random PFN falls into an unallocated section, __pfn_to_section() will
be invalid. Attempting to read the section_mem_map from it will lead to an
immediate NULL pointer dereference in C code before the prefetchw instruction
is ever reached.

> +}
> +

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260423122340.138880-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-23 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-23 12:23 [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon: introduce damon_rand_fast() for per-ctx PRNG Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-23 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/paddr: prefetch struct page of the next region Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-23 19:25   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-24  1:42   ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-23 19:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon: introduce damon_rand_fast() for per-ctx PRNG sashiko-bot
2026-04-24  1:36 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-24  2:29   ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-24 15:11     ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-25  3:36       ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-25 15:59         ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-26  5:50           ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-26 17:33             ` SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260423192534.300CEC2BCB2@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox