From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 07:30:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427143052.111666-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427000012.7E772C2BCAF@smtp.kernel.org>
On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:11 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
> - [High] Writing to the `commit_inputs` sysfs parameter before the DAMON worker thread (`kdamond`) is started causes the writing task to hang indefinitely in an unkillable D-state.
I think this is wrong.
> --
>
> commit 43a70e5ab295c21c0b94eddd32d886c9d0eba3fa
> Author: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
>
> mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs
>
> This commit changes the commit_inputs_store() callback to use damon_call()
> to synchronously commit parameters in the kdamond thread's safe context.
> This ensures validation errors are returned immediately to userspace.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260318153731.97470-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > index 554559d72976..641af42cc2d1 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -349,18 +348,51 @@ static int damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters(void)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static int damon_lru_sort_handle_commit_inputs(void)
> > +static int damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_fn(void *arg)
> > {
> > + return damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_store(const char *val,
> > + const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > +{
> > + bool commit_inputs_request;
> > int err;
> > + struct damon_call_control control = {
> > + .fn = damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_fn,
> > + };
> >
> > - if (!commit_inputs)
> > + if (!val) {
> > + commit_inputs_request = true;
> > + } else {
> > + err = kstrtobool(val, &commit_inputs_request);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> >
> > + if (!commit_inputs_request)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - err = damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters();
> > - commit_inputs = false;
> > - return err;
> > + /*
> > + * Skip damon_call() if ctx is not initialized to avoid
> > + * NULL pointer dereference.
> > + */
> > + if (!ctx)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
>
> If the module has not yet been enabled (e.g., enabled=N) and the kdamond
> thread is not running, does this call to damon_call() block indefinitely?
>
> Since ctx is allocated during initialization, the ctx pointer is not NULL.
> damon_call() then queues the control request and calls wait_for_completion().
>
> Without the background thread running to process the queue and signal
> completion, it seems the sysfs writer task is placed into an unkillable
> D-state forever.
No. ctx is initialized to NULL because it is static. Once it is set,
kdamond_fn() is started. If user stops kdamond by writing N to enabled,
ctx->call_controls_obsolete is set. If user further writes Y to commit_inputs
for invoking damon_call(), it will return -ECANCELED due to
ctx->call_controls_obsolete.
>
> The damon_call() documentation indicates it should only be called after
> damon_start() has succeeded, otherwise it could fall into an indefinite wait.
Yes, and that's excluded here since the module is not calling damon_call() for
NULL ctx.
>
> > +
> > + return err ? err : control.return_code;
> > }
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > index 86da14778658..4fc4a54b5e54 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -255,18 +254,51 @@ static int damon_reclaim_apply_parameters(void)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static int damon_reclaim_handle_commit_inputs(void)
> > +static int damon_reclaim_commit_inputs_fn(void *arg)
> > {
> > + return damon_reclaim_apply_parameters();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int damon_reclaim_commit_inputs_store(const char *val,
> > + const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > +{
> > + bool commit_inputs_request;
> > int err;
> > + struct damon_call_control control = {
> > + .fn = damon_reclaim_commit_inputs_fn,
> > + };
> >
> > - if (!commit_inputs)
> > + if (!val) {
> > + commit_inputs_request = true;
> > + } else {
> > + err = kstrtobool(val, &commit_inputs_request);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!commit_inputs_request)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - err = damon_reclaim_apply_parameters();
> > - commit_inputs = false;
> > - return err;
> > + /*
> > + * Skip damon_call() if ctx is not initialized to avoid
> > + * NULL pointer dereference.
> > + */
> > + if (!ctx)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
>
> Could this exhibit the same hang as in damon_lru_sort.c? If the worker
> thread has not been started, does writing to commit_inputs block forever?
Same to the above reply, no.
>
> > +
> > + return err ? err : control.return_code;
> > }
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260426231619.107231-1-sj@kernel.org?part=3
Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-26 23:16 [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/damon: repost non-hotfix reviewed patches in damon/next tree SeongJae Park
2026-04-26 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/damon/ops-common: optimize damon_hot_score() using ilog2() SeongJae Park
2026-04-26 23:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-27 14:18 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-27 15:09 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-26 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon: fix 'parametrs' typo SeongJae Park
2026-04-27 23:39 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-28 7:38 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-04-28 14:21 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-26 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/damon: add synchronous commit for commit_inputs SeongJae Park
2026-04-27 0:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-27 14:30 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-04-26 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/damon: support MADV_COLLAPSE via DAMOS_COLLAPSE scheme action SeongJae Park
2026-04-27 23:41 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260427143052.111666-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox