From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Liew Rui Yan" <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mm/damon/lru_sort: validate min_region_size to be power of 2
Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 02:16:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260501021643.9CBAFC2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260501013750.71704-2-aethernet65535@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] A Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition exists between the validation of `damon_lru_sort_mon_attrs.sample_interval` and its subsequent use, leading to a division-by-zero kernel panic.
--
commit 27c4642b5b420a4c1731c9385273b591e05b5b4c
Author: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
mm/damon/lru_sort: validate min_region_size to be power of 2
This commit adds early validation for the min_region_sz parameter to ensure
it is a power of 2. It prevents kdamond from incorrectly terminating with
the maybe_corrupted flag when a user simply sets an invalid addr_unit.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> index 2eb559d913b62..eca88ed941b32 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/lru_sort.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,11 @@ static int damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters(void)
> param_ctx->addr_unit = addr_unit;
> param_ctx->min_region_sz = max(DAMON_MIN_REGION_SZ / addr_unit, 1);
>
> + if (!is_power_of_2(param_ctx->min_region_sz)) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> if (!damon_lru_sort_mon_attrs.sample_interval) {
This isn't a regression introduced by this patch, but can a time-of-check
to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition happen here?
Because damon_lru_sort_mon_attrs is exposed as a module parameter, it can
be modified concurrently. If a user concurrently writes 0 to sample_interval
immediately after this check passes, the local attrs struct would copy the
new zero value:
attrs = damon_lru_sort_mon_attrs;
Later in the function, damon_max_nr_accesses(&attrs) evaluates
attrs.aggr_interval / attrs.sample_interval. Since sample_interval would
be 0, could this trigger a divide-by-zero exception?
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260501013750.71704-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-01 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 1:37 [PATCH v5 0/2] mm/damon: validate min_region_size to be power of 2 Liew Rui Yan
2026-05-01 1:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] mm/damon/lru_sort: " Liew Rui Yan
2026-05-01 2:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-02 1:50 ` SeongJae Park
2026-05-02 1:51 ` SeongJae Park
2026-05-01 1:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] mm/damon/reclaim: " Liew Rui Yan
2026-05-02 1:52 ` SeongJae Park
2026-05-12 3:36 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] mm/damon: " SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260501021643.9CBAFC2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox