From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 22:42:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514054253.116346-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514021725.2801FC19425@smtp.kernel.org>
On Thu, 14 May 2026 02:17:24 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] The patch fails to fix the state machine deadlock that prevents kdamond from restarting, leaving the bug described in the commit message unresolved.
> - [Low] The patch introduces calls to undefined functions `damon_is_running()` and `damon_kdamond_pid()`, causing a build failure.
> --
>
> commit de09cefa1bba6b569eff518a49dbc5fb07b59452
> Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values
>
> This patch updates DAMON_RECLAIM to dynamically detect the status of the
> enabled and kdamond_pid parameters. It aims to prevent users from seeing
> stale status values and being unable to restart the kdamond thread when
> it stops unintentionally.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260419161003.79176-1-sj@kernel.org
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260419161003.79176-2-sj@kernel.org
>
> > For example, the issue can be reproduced via below steps.
> [ ... ]
> > # # even after fixing the wrong parameter,
> > # # kdamond cannot be restarted.
> > # echo 1 > addr_unit
> > # echo Y > enabled
> > # ps -ef | grep kdamond
> > root 815 803 0 17:54 pts/4 00:00:00 grep kdamond
>
> Does this patch actually resolve the restart issue described here?
>
> Looking at damon_reclaim_timer_fn(), the state machine still appears to
> deadlock if kdamond stops unintentionally:
>
> now_enabled = enabled;
> if (last_enabled != now_enabled) {
> if (!damon_reclaim_turn(now_enabled))
> last_enabled = now_enabled;
> else
> enabled = last_enabled;
> }
>
> When kdamond dies, the global enabled and static last_enabled variables
> remain true.
>
> If a user writes 'Y' to enabled, the timer sees last_enabled == now_enabled
> (true == true) and exits without restarting kdamond.
>
> If a user writes 'N' to enabled, the timer calls damon_reclaim_turn(false),
> which invokes damon_stop(). Since the thread is already dead, damon_stop()
> returns -EPERM. The timer misinterprets this as a failure to stop and
> executes enabled = last_enabled, reverting enabled back to true.
>
> Could this leave the state machine permanently deadlocked?
Correct. The enabled_store() part porting was incomplete, similar to the
matching lru_sort patch. I will post a complete porting.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > index 7952a0b7f409d..dc435aefd44f5 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -220,6 +203,13 @@ static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(damon_reclaim_timer, damon_reclaim_timer_fn);
> >
> > static bool damon_reclaim_initialized;
> >
> > +static bool damon_reclaim_enabled(void)
> > +{
> > + if (!ctx)
> > + return false;
> > + return damon_is_running(ctx);
>
> Are damon_is_running() and damon_kdamond_pid() defined anywhere in the tree?
>
> They don't appear to be declared in include/linux/damon.h or defined in
> mm/damon/core.c.
>
> Could this patch depend on prerequisite patches that might be missing?
> Without them, this causes implicit function declaration errors and
> unresolved symbol linker errors.
I informed this and where the dependent patches can be found, on the commentary
area of the patch.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260513050501.216835-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2026051257-daytime-precise-afd3@gregkh>
2026-05-13 5:05 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values SeongJae Park
2026-05-14 2:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 5:42 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-05-14 5:45 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514054253.116346-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox