From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C322BF3D7; Mon, 25 May 2026 16:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779727871; cv=none; b=hmEn9cp4ohxJkhhqhI8TfnvDMJAYmUq37XXyt7pQkmArogD6+ZD/ehR1e1G3Txel3MT9WT9eBEMs4Jemq+htV4EjxE6utfoQgrtpDMN60ctlwoYmcdcRGc2JMMTy4Wmf7Oeed+vzSNA3K0SYn1+HJh9FtbPr2PyIU2oZJ5hDXyU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779727871; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cIjKw8EzEyZkSEdCzqZ1uJhg1YfkvLHhVblyezYlSXE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=TH1z8/H6RoqpUlaw3NR/9JEAQrmrIPlvHEocFXAwxfpb+hTSOrbPyJgaXAzNM98yyq5XvvFX4u3Cr/J+LgW659wYNXf3Ke8/UIuCWbtIJ2ABzZr/KyU3UmfsHB5r4KqIhC4RAX8Asvo9yvyG1hx7i05kanGJ92aRKvXSeUiD50A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QNvlsXGN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QNvlsXGN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 407081F000E9; Mon, 25 May 2026 16:51:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779727869; bh=RGRd8m08iAzM3f86tiDF6ZjDlkBX7e5O1+6jLpCVw3s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=QNvlsXGNa81D0EBa1qX7xZDUp+8/Ls6apCzLG273YuQJBT9NwFVlzp44FTRpZ47IO KyGf8GnSHjmxGy9u6qJFjRTbYGsCgC7vV5tdozfMWsEOqZ40mYL83QX4UgHCCtYbrd 0YDVRvAANttHskBTchc12Hpl5NCqv9eOy0nXqu2fP+4RkMgP2fffBXcDCfo6AJ0gpB evKwHIABPPPl+k/lj6qMDI3NwkXRXxwzm3MTbCBHKXqGJp01+N9A5baqqiHSjI1DO2 8FfVh/gf4vettLoGTDX84TAgX4kOdLv00jVH3PUcqnTvMpd9ZXCzAi+3ETfteItaAm AErM/NjqC3Unw== From: SeongJae Park To: Gutierrez Asier Cc: SeongJae Park , artem.kuzin@huawei.com, stepanov.anatoly@huawei.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, yanquanmin1@huawei.com, zuoze1@huawei.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] mm/damon: Introduce DAMOS_QUOTA_HUGEPAGE auto tuning Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 09:51:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20260525165100.9016-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 25 May 2026 18:04:25 +0300 Gutierrez Asier wrote: > > > On 5/23/2026 8:27 PM, SeongJae Park wrote: > > On Fri, 22 May 2026 14:55:16 +0000 wrote: > > > >> From: Asier Gutierrez > >> > >> Introduce DAMOS_QUOTA_HUGEPAGE auto tuning Add a new DAMOS quota goal > > > > I'd suggest to rename it to DAMOS_QUOTA_HUGEPAGE_BP for consistency. > > > > Also, you missed the ending period after 'tuning'. > > > >> metric to measure the amount of huge page consumption to total > >> anonymous memory consumption ratio. > > > > Why against anonymous memory only? > Well, that was my first approach. All the projects that I have done > recently were related to anonymous memory. I'll test it with total > THP user vs total memory consumption and see if everything works > in the same way. Makes sense, looking forward to the test result! [...] Thanks, SJ