DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.1 01/11] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() target (normal), context and kdamond dirs
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 17:44:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618004428.82261-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617150910.1CDB11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>

On Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:09:09 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:

> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
> 
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Memory leak and uninitialized pointer dereference in `damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs()` error path due to shifted labels.
> - [Medium] Missing `kobject_del()` in `damos_sysfs_probes_rm_dirs()` causes sysfs name conflicts under `CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE`.
> - [Medium] Missing `kobject_del()` in `damon_sysfs_schemes_add_dirs()` error path causes sysfs name conflicts.
> --
> 
> commit ca062d775b58ea3ec065a28f4400047399c0f380
> Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
> 
> mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() target (normal), context and kdamond dirs
>     
> On CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE enabled kernel, lack of kobject_del()
> could cause directories creation failures due to the name conflicts. Fix
> those issues for normal creation paths of target, context and kdamond
> directories, and error paths of context and kdamond directories by
> adding kobject_del() calls.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.18.x
> 
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs.c b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> > index 2e95e3bac774d..dba1c67fc188f 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -1642,6 +1643,7 @@ static void damon_sysfs_contexts_rm_dirs(struct damon_sysfs_contexts *contexts)
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < contexts->nr; i++) {
> >  		damon_sysfs_context_rm_dirs(contexts_arr[i]);
> > +		kobject_del(&contexts_arr[i]->kobj);
> >  		kobject_put(&contexts_arr[i]->kobj);
> >  	}
> >  	contexts->nr = 0;
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does damos_sysfs_probes_rm_dirs()
> need a similar kobject_del() fix to avoid sysfs name conflicts?
> 
> mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damos_sysfs_probes_rm_dirs() {
> ...
> 	for (i = 0; i < probes->nr; i++)
> 		kobject_put(&probes_arr[i]->kobj);
> 	probes->nr = 0;
> ...
> }

No.  Users cannot directly generate/remove only probe dirs.  Hence probe dirs
are generated and removed together with their parent, region directory.
Because the region directory cleanup is doing kobject_del(), this code path
doesn't need kobject_del().

> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -1680,13 +1682,15 @@ static int damon_sysfs_contexts_add_dirs(struct damon_sysfs_contexts *contexts,
> >  
> >  		err = damon_sysfs_context_add_dirs(context);
> >  		if (err)
> > -			goto out;
> > +			goto del_out;
> >  
> >  		contexts_arr[i] = context;
> >  		contexts->nr++;
> >  	}
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> > +del_out:
> > +	kobject_del(&context->kobj);
> >  out:
> >  	damon_sysfs_contexts_rm_dirs(contexts);
> >  	kobject_put(&context->kobj);
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but does damon_sysfs_schemes_add_dirs() need a
> similar kobject_del() fix in its error path?
> 
> mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damon_sysfs_schemes_add_dirs() {
> ...
> 		err = kobject_init_and_add(&scheme->kobj, ...);
> 		if (err)
> 			goto out;
> 		err = damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs(scheme);
> 		if (err)
> 			goto out;
> ...
> out:
> 	damon_sysfs_schemes_rm_dirs(schemes);
> 	kobject_put(&scheme->kobj);
> 	return err;
> }
> 
> If damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs() fails after kobject_init_and_add() succeeds,
> the out label puts the reference without unlinking it.
> 
> Could this cause a directory creation failure on retry under delayed release?

Yes, good finding.  I will fix this in the next revision.

> 
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while looking at error paths,
> does damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs() have an uninitialized pointer dereference
> and a resource leak?
> 
> mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs() {
> ...
> 	err = damon_sysfs_scheme_set_stats(scheme);
> 	if (err)
> 		goto put_filters_watermarks_quotas_access_pattern_out;
> 	err = damon_sysfs_scheme_set_tried_regions(scheme);
> 	if (err)
> 		goto put_tried_regions_out;
> 	return 0;
> 
> put_tried_regions_out:
> 	kobject_put(&scheme->tried_regions->kobj);
> 	scheme->tried_regions = NULL;
> ...
> }
> 
> If damon_sysfs_scheme_set_tried_regions() fails, the code jumps to
> put_tried_regions_out and dereferences scheme->tried_regions. 
> 
> Since damon_sysfs_scheme_alloc() allocates memory without zeroing it, won't
> this dereference an uninitialized pointer?
> 
> Additionally, this jump entirely skips cleaning up the successfully
> initialized stats object.
> 
> Should there be a put_stats_out cleanup label to avoid leaking it?

Yes.  And I'm separately working on this.

Sashiko review comments are only repeating the findings in this reply.  Hence I
will not reply to each of the other replies.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-17 14:47 [RFC PATCH v1.1 00/11] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() directories that users can create/remove SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 14:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 01/11] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() target (normal), context and kdamond dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  0:44     ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-06-17 14:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 02/11] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() region and target (error) dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 03/11] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 04/11] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme region dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 05/11] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme filter dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 06/11] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme quota goal dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 07/11] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme action destination dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 08/11] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() probe dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 09/11] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() probe filter dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 10/11] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() probe dirs in probes_addd_dir error path SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 11/11] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() region for populate_region error SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 15:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  0:48 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 00/11] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() directories that users can create/remove SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260618004428.82261-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox