From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/13] mm/damon: introduce damon_nr_accesses_mvsum()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:44:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260619194428.7A3BA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260619193415.73833-2-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Kernel panic due to division by zero in `damon_nr_accesses_mvsum()` when `aggr_interval` is configured to 0.
- [Medium] Integer overflow in `mult_frac()` leading to severely incorrect access scoring on 32-bit systems when `window_len` is large.
--
commit 0c6de91631a66fe41c1e81f68011cf31d86b4825
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon: introduce damon_nr_accesses_mvsum()
This commit introduces damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() to calculate a pseudo
moving sum of a given region's nr_accesses for the last aggregation
interval. The function is designed to be executed on-demand rather than
at every sampling interval.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
[ ... ]
> +unsigned int damon_nr_accesses_mvsum(struct damon_region *r,
> + struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + unsigned long sample_interval, window_len, left_window, left_window_bp;
> +
> + sample_interval = ctx->attrs.sample_interval ? : 1;
> + window_len = ctx->attrs.aggr_interval / sample_interval;
> + left_window = ctx->next_aggregation_sis - ctx->passed_sample_intervals;
> + left_window_bp = mult_frac(left_window, 10000, window_len);
[Severity: High]
What happens here if aggr_interval is configured to 0?
If userspace configures both aggr_interval and sample_interval to 0
via sysfs, sample_interval evaluates to 1 through the fallback, but
window_len becomes 0.
When window_len is passed as the denominator to mult_frac(), does this
result in a divide-by-zero kernel panic?
[Severity: Medium]
Is there a risk of an integer overflow here on 32-bit systems?
The mult_frac(x, n, d) macro evaluates the fractional part using the type
of x, which is an unsigned long here. On 32-bit architectures, this has
a maximum value of ~4.29 billion.
If a 5-second aggregation interval and 1-microsecond sample interval are
configured, window_len and left_window could reach 5,000,000.
The intermediate multiplication in mult_frac():
(left_window % window_len) * 10000
could evaluate to around 50,000,000,000, which overflows a 32-bit
unsigned long. Could this lead to inaccurate access frequency calculations?
> +
> + return damon_mvsum(r->nr_accesses, r->last_nr_accesses,
> + left_window_bp);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260619193415.73833-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 19:33 [RFC PATCH 00/13] mm/damon: optimize out nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] mm/damon: introduce damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-19 19:52 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test damon_mvsum() SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() in __damos_valid_target() SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() for damos region tracing SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 20:17 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() for damo regions SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 19:55 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] mm/damon/core: remove damon_warn_fix_nr_accesses_corruption() SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 19:56 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_reset_aggregated() SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_merge_regions_of() SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: remove nr_accesses_bp setup and tests SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 20:24 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] selftests/damon/drgn_dump_damon_status: do not dump nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] mm/damon/core: remove nr_accesses_bp setups and updates SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] mm/damon/core: remove damon_moving_sum() and its unit test SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:33 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] mm/damon: remove damon_region->nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19 20:36 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260619194428.7A3BA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox