From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/damon: handle zero sampling interval in damon_max_nr_accesses()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 21:03:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260619210304.A89AD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260619205144.150664-1-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch replaces a divide-by-zero crash in `damon_max_nr_accesses()` with a divide-by-zero crash in caller functions such as `damon_hot_score()`. When `aggr_interval` and `sample_interval` are 0, `damon_max_nr_accesses()` returns 0, which is then used as a divisor by its callers.
--
commit ca6b91d50d3b7234e014066f6e835c8aab906f49
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon: handle zero sampling interval in damon_max_nr_accesses()
damon_max_nr_accesses() causes divide-by-zero if sampling interval is
zero. Fix it by handling the case.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260619202459.145010-1-sj@kernel.org
> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> index 6f7edb3590ef9..83b43d8ffef38 100644
> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> @@ -1065,8 +1065,10 @@ static inline bool damon_target_has_pid(const struct damon_ctx *ctx)
>
> static inline unsigned int damon_max_nr_accesses(const struct damon_attrs *attrs)
> {
> + unsigned long sample_interval = attrs->sample_interval ? : 1;
> +
> /* {aggr,sample}_interval are unsigned long, hence could overflow */
> - return min(attrs->aggr_interval / attrs->sample_interval,
> + return min(attrs->aggr_interval / sample_interval,
> (unsigned long)UINT_MAX);
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this patch shift the divide-by-zero
crash to the callers of damon_max_nr_accesses()?
If a user configures DAMON via sysfs with both sample_interval and
aggr_interval set to 0, damon_set_attrs() allows it because the validation
check evaluates to false (0 > 0):
mm/damon/core.c:damon_set_attrs() {
if (attrs->sample_interval > attrs->aggr_interval)
return -EINVAL;
...
}
With this patch applied, damon_max_nr_accesses() prevents the initial
division by zero by defaulting sample_interval to 1. However, it then
evaluates min(0 / 1, UINT_MAX) and returns 0.
Later, when a DAMOS scheme with a quota is evaluated, damon_hot_score() uses
the return value as a divisor:
mm/damon/ops-common.c:damon_hot_score() {
...
freq_subscore = r->nr_accesses * DAMON_MAX_SUBSCORE /
damon_max_nr_accesses(&c->attrs);
...
}
Since damon_max_nr_accesses() now successfully returns 0, wouldn't this
trigger a divide-by-zero exception in damon_hot_score() instead?
Could we explicitly reject an aggr_interval of 0 in damon_set_attrs(), or
ensure damon_max_nr_accesses() always returns at least 1?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260619205144.150664-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 20:51 [RFC PATCH] mm/damon: handle zero sampling interval in damon_max_nr_accesses() SeongJae Park
2026-06-19 21:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-19 21:07 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260619210304.A89AD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox