From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Igor Putko" <igorpetindev@gmail.com>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/damon/vaddr: remove redundant RCU lock
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:16:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630131611.D6D9C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630130253.3843-1-igorpetindev@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] VMA iteration on an external mm_struct is performed without checking check_stable_address_space(mm), which can lead to iterating a corrupted maple tree.
--
commit fdc4435ee0611e8373511ef284a90ecc98420eec
Author: Igor Putko <igorpetindev@gmail.com>
mm/damon/vaddr: remove redundant RCU lock
This commit removes rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() from
__damon_va_three_regions() and adds them to its kunit test. It asserts that
mmap_read_lock() is sufficient to protect the maple tree during VMA iteration.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> index e73ec1ce016e5..882cc7cb09027 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int __damon_va_three_regions(struct mm_struct *mm,
> * If this is too slow, it can be optimised to examine the maple
> * tree gaps.
> */
> - rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_vma(vmi, vma) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing the VMA traversal here,
I noticed a potential problem with how the mmap_read_lock is used by the
callers of this function.
When traversing VMAs on an external mm_struct, does this code need to check
check_stable_address_space(mm) before iterating?
Looking at damon_va_three_regions() and damon_va_walk_page_range(), they
acquire mmap_read_lock(mm) and proceed directly to VMA traversal:
mm/damon/vaddr.c:damon_va_three_regions() {
...
mmap_read_lock(mm);
rc = __damon_va_three_regions(mm, regions);
mmap_read_unlock(mm);
...
}
If the OOM reaper runs on the target process, it can mark the mm as unstable
and leave XA_ZERO_ENTRY markers in the maple tree. Iterating this corrupted
tree without first verifying check_stable_address_space(mm) can lead to
kernel crashes.
Could this be triggered under system memory pressure while DAMON is
monitoring?
> unsigned long gap;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630130253.3843-1-igorpetindev@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 16:53 [PATCH] mm/damon/vaddr: remove redundant RCU lock IgorpetinDev
2026-06-29 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 0:41 ` SJ Park
2026-06-30 1:00 ` SJ Park
2026-06-30 13:01 ` Igor Putko
2026-06-30 13:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 13:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Igor Putko
2026-06-30 13:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-30 14:03 ` SJ Park
2026-06-30 13:07 ` [PATCH] " Igor Putko
2026-06-30 13:54 ` SJ Park
2026-06-30 14:25 ` Igor Putko
2026-06-30 14:50 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630131611.D6D9C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=igorpetindev@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox