From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6A1314A79 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783008660; cv=none; b=nmjgqmaY2WR4Cc5xbQd9JKavlslDMYg1GcsP9f4rk/iOmEe/YjDkuj/caDeUNOYgLMsnO/D7n2Dz0fzon93feKD4IKx8Epv8uWTsOSn0Sb5NmQtjX7CpRTq90hoa4u2cKBincsveUEYTeRUKGvcZSDDkSZGMSYR1dOots6brm2M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783008660; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AOiEZS4MHz5VeUNDsjOKpnxlEfTyOIwdy0F82H2tgi8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=ey5AWPfpAlpYWhJZiBG67/xiGvBcjezMae332GFSbQGnd9v70V6Odv4MgmoqAYdhPGhq1ZFD4n8D7h7L2KpMGk69L91FrIG0eWIIJ6q8st7e60N000JmXi2fghUmsyn/NfNl0zlDNuZO4xmk9djclSgeBxBsNsCmTT3g+NVLSzA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lpDOoDLy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lpDOoDLy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D84D11F000E9; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:10:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783008659; bh=3YfVzEcUkg829B5uyfjxZ2w2e7Qcu1+uMV+pJJ7jiGg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=lpDOoDLy1aaUtY2ZdMR3wKk1uaopv6Mu+Ue0/vIn9Iydk4MSKPPRmiZVd68G3pYXK 1QM9qI/Z4zE1kRZ+t/IG6a7Wz2e7oKa+S9jXc7nR6Cu627ohbHFtnJupyZ/3yaYINS 1zmEq7CP1uaZdYmgo7fXJU2/CJHJ1pfHaj2uynyvUKX9i9tk2014iyjMwsB7haqKp2 FyAvarRUEEBEYZy1nkaicCOfW/57SrZHOh/9McjWEd15KpJ3c83XZj9DUPiW102xdb LsfJVphEhI4iHd3m4wuvwwNAYL3A8h9IvwAAsVJQ2Wa94g3leU0Vozdq513zMIbAWW dzAL1ZaTg2WVA== From: SJ Park To: wang lian Cc: SJ Park , damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, daichaobing@sangfor.com.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 09:10:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20260702161049.86172-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260702065244.70360-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 14:52:44 +0800 wang lian wrote: > From: Wang Lian > > Hi SJ, > > Thank you for correcting my misunderstanding of the versioning rules. > This was indeed a mistake on my part, and I apologize for the confusion. > > I did not intend to claim that this series is ready to be merged as-is in its current state. > I fully expected to send this iteration as an "RFC v2" to continue our high-level architectural > discussion, especially given the major structural pivots we made from v1 > (dropping the debugfs pipeline and shifting the telemetry to user space). > I mistakenly incremented the version number to [PATCH v2] while > prematurely dropping the RFC tag. No worry, thank you for clarifying! > > Since my true intention is to gather feedback on this new user-space control > plane approach before any final merge integration, I would like to fix this immediately. > > I will re-send this exact series right away with the correct tag: > [RFC PATCH v2 0/5], following the versioning pipeline you suggested. > > Please hold off on reviewing this "PATCH v2" thread; > I will get the proper "RFC v2" into your inbox in a moment. I got it. I will review it soon. Thanks, SJ [...]