From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.3 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 18:10:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710011045.113001-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710003840.32C011F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:38:39 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Premature termination of regions merging when using probe weights, breaking `max_nr_regions` enforcement.
> --
>
> --- Patch [14]: [RFC PATCH v1.3 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set ---
> commit c2e77863ffba068b4f2b7db5f45690d846ec2ad7
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set
>
> This commit updates DAMON to calculate the merge threshold based on the
> maximum probe hits weighted sum when probe weights are used. It updates
> kdamond_fn() to retrieve this max sum via the apply_probes() callback.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > index f7782c69037da..91964336ce31e 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -3776,9 +3777,18 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
> >
> > if (!access_check_disabled && ctx->ops.check_accesses)
> > max_merge_score = ctx->ops.check_accesses(ctx);
> > - if (ctx->ops.apply_probes)
> > - ctx->ops.apply_probes(ctx, access_check_disabled,
> > - false);
> > + if (ctx->ops.apply_probes) {
> > + if (time_after_eq(ctx->passed_sample_intervals,
> > + next_aggregation_sis) &&
> > + access_check_disabled)
> > + get_max_wsum = true;
> > + else
> > + get_max_wsum = false;
> > + max_wsum = ctx->ops.apply_probes(ctx,
> > + access_check_disabled, get_max_wsum);
> > + if (get_max_wsum)
> > + max_merge_score = max_wsum;
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this regression break the max_nr_regions enforcement in
> kdamond_merge_regions()?
>
> When probe weights are set, max_merge_score is derived from the user-provided
> probe weights and passed as the initial threshold to kdamond_merge_regions():
>
> mm/damon/core.c:kdamond_merge_regions() {
> ...
> max_thres = c->attrs.aggr_interval /
> (c->attrs.sample_interval ? c->attrs.sample_interval : 1);
> do {
> ...
> threshold = max(1, threshold * 2);
> } while (nr_regions > c->attrs.max_nr_regions &&
> threshold / 2 < max_thres);
> ...
> }
>
> However, max_thres is hardcoded to the maximum unweighted access frequency.
>
> If the dynamically weighted max_wsum is large enough, the initial threshold
> passed to kdamond_merge_regions() could exceed max_thres * 2.
>
> If that happens, wouldn't the loop terminate prematurely on the first pass
> even when nr_regions > max_nr_regions, allowing the number of regions to
> grow unboundedly?
No issue. The later patch of this series will set max_thres with weighted sum.
>
> > + }
> >
> > if (time_after_eq(ctx->passed_sample_intervals,
> > next_aggregation_sis)) {
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710002349.111414-1-sj@kernel.org?part=14
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 0:23 [RFC PATCH v1.3 00/19] mm/damon: introduce data attributes only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 01/19] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_probe->weight SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 02/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probes() ops callback to set sampling address SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 1:01 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 03/19] mm/damon/paddr: set samples in apply_probes() if requested SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 05/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_probe_hits_wsum() SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 06/19] mm/damon/paddr: respect return_max_wsum SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 07/19] mm/damon/core: use abs_diff() instead of abs() SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 08/19] mm/damon/core: extend merge function to work with probe hits SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 09/19] mm/damon/core: disallow probe_hits overflow on attrs only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 1:02 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 11/19] mm/damon/core: disable access monitoring when probe weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 1:08 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 12/19] mm/damon/core: set samples in apply_probes() if " SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 13/19] mm/damon/core: s/max_nr_accesses/max_merge_score/ in kdamond_fn() SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 1:10 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 15/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight() SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 1:18 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 16/19] mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe/weight file SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 17/19] Docs/mm/damon/design: document attrs-only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 18/19] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document weight sysfs file SJ Park
2026-07-10 0:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.3 19/19] Docs/ABI/damon: document probe weight file SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710011045.113001-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox