DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:44:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717004417.9F9F31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717003022.119437-3-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Kernel memory corruption in `damon_apply_min_nr_regions()` due to unhandled split failure.
- [Medium] Incomplete test fix for memory allocation failure in `damos_filter_match()` leading to test crash.
- [Medium] Missing upper bound checks in test loops leading to Out-Of-Bounds array reads.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() ---
commit c03465ac93de9ac544447d782c3c2ea15bf60ab1
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at()

damon_test_split_at() tests the next region that is assumed to be created by
damon_split_region_at(). But the split might fail. In this case, the test is
updated to check if the number of regions changed as expected and exit early.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260714142352.100478-1-sj@kernel.org

> diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> index eba643762132f..322a295ac2cec 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,10 @@ static void damon_test_split_at(struct kunit *test)
>  	r->age = 10;
>  	damon_add_region(r, t);
>  	damon_split_region_at(t, r, 25);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 2);
> +	if (damon_nr_regions(t) != 2)
> +		goto out;
> +

[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but it looks like the exact
same pattern being fixed here is present in damos_test_filter_out().

If damos_filter_match() fails to allocate memory, it returns without
splitting the region. The test logs a failure for the region count mismatch
but execution continues unconditionally:

mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h:damos_test_filter_out() {
        /* filter should have split the region */
        ...
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 2);
        r2 = damon_next_region(r);
        ...
        damon_destroy_region(r2, t);
}

Since r is the only item in the list, does damon_next_region(r) resolve to
an out-of-bounds pointer that is then passed to damon_destroy_region(),
causing list and slab corruption during test execution?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since we are handling split failures in 
the tests, does mm/damon/core.c:damon_apply_min_nr_regions() suffer from a
similar problem in production code?

mm/damon/core.c:damon_apply_min_nr_regions() {
        damon_for_each_target(t, ctx) {
                damon_for_each_region_safe(r, next, t) {
                        while (damon_sz_region(r) > max_region_sz) {
                                damon_split_region_at(t, r, max_region_sz);
                                r = damon_next_region(r);
                        }
                }
        }
}

If damon_split_region_at() fails to allocate memory, it silently returns. 
The loop then unconditionally advances r = damon_next_region(r). If r was 
the last region, this returns a bogus pointer derived from the list head. 

The loop condition damon_sz_region(r) then evaluates garbage memory. If it
happens to evaluate to greater than max_region_sz, the loop re-enters and
passes the bogus pointer to damon_split_region_at(). Could this lead to
out-of-bounds writes and list corruption under memory pressure?

[Severity: Medium]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing the kunit tests, I 
noticed several test loops lack upper bound checks against the destination
counts. 

For example, in damos_test_commit_dests_for():

mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h:damos_test_commit_dests_for() {
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dst.nr_dests, src_nr_dests);
        for (i = 0; i < dst.nr_dests; i++) {
                KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dst.node_id_arr[i], src_node_id_arr[i]);
        ...
}

If the code under test incorrectly leaves dst.nr_dests greater than
src_nr_dests (for instance, when src_nr_dests is 0), the loop iterates out 
of bounds and dereferences src_node_id_arr[i]. 

The same unbounded iteration pattern appears to exist in 
damos_test_commit_quota_goals_for() and damon_test_commit_target_regions_for(). 
Could these also be fixed to prevent out-of-bounds reads during test failures?

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717003022.119437-1-sj@kernel.org?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17  0:30 [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17  1:12     ` SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:44   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17  1:18     ` SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm/damon/vaddr-kunit: check region count in three_regions test SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: handle region split failure in filter_out() SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17  1:22     ` SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for() SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals() SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17  1:23     ` SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong region walk in commit_target_regions() SJ Park
2026-07-17  1:05 ` [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717004417.9F9F31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox