DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/core: make charge_addr_from aware of end-address exclusivity
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 05:08:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721050823.685471F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721045818.157773-1-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Modifying the local region pointer `r` inside the `damon_for_each_scheme` loop causes subsequent schemes to miss the first half of a split region.
- [High] Regions created by `damon_split_region_at()` are silently skipped by the caller's safe list iterator.
- [High] Failure to set `charge_target_from` when the remaining quota is less than `DAMON_MIN_REGION` breaks the round-robin mechanism and wastes CPU.
- [Medium] The scheme's resume logic unconditionally skips the uncharged remainder of a target's last region when resetting the charge state.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/core: make charge_addr_from aware of end-address exclusivity ---
commit 5e517614c6d1a61febddeb99e7bb671793abbca6
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/damon/core: make charge_addr_from aware of end-address exclusivity

This commit fixes a bug where charge_addr_from was assigned assuming the
end address is inclusive. It changes the assignment to respect the
exclusiveness of the DAMON region end address.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260428042942.118230-1-sj@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260428032324.115663-1-sj@kernel.org [1]

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index d293200d824e9..4b434ebd37c53 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c,
>  			quota->charged_sz += sz;
>  			if (quota->esz && quota->charged_sz >= quota->esz) {
>  				quota->charge_target_from = t;
> -				quota->charge_addr_from = r->ar.end + 1;
> +				quota->charge_addr_from = r->ar.end;
>  			}
>  		}
>  		if (s->action != DAMOS_STAT)

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the safe iterator in
kdamond_apply_schemes() skip newly inserted regions?

mm/damon/core.c:kdamond_apply_schemes() {
    ...
    damon_for_each_region_safe(r, next_r, t) {
        ...
        damon_do_apply_schemes(c, t, r);
    }
}

If damon_do_apply_schemes() calls damon_split_region_at(), it inserts a new
region immediately after r. Because next_r is cached before the loop body,
the newly inserted right-hand region falls into a blind spot and appears to
be skipped for the current aggregation interval.

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible that reassigning the local
region pointer causes subsequent schemes to miss the first half of a split
region?

mm/damon/core.c:damon_do_apply_schemes() {
    ...
    damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
        ...
        if (quota->charge_addr_from && r->ar.start < quota->charge_addr_from) {
            ...
            damon_split_region_at(t, r, sz);
            r = damon_next_region(r);
            sz = damon_sz_region(r);
        }
        ...
    }
}

Modifying the loop parameter r leaks to subsequent schemes in the iteration,
causing them to evaluate only the second half of the split region and
completely miss the first half.

[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could this logic unconditionally skip the
uncharged remainder of a target's last region?

mm/damon/core.c:damon_do_apply_schemes() {
    ...
    if (r == damon_last_region(t)) {
        quota->charge_target_from = NULL;
        quota->charge_addr_from = 0;
        continue;
    }
    ...
}

When resuming from a previous charge window that exhausted its quota in the
middle of the last region of a target, it looks like this clears the charge
tracking and immediately executes continue, skipping the evaluation of the rest
of the region.

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this jump break the round-robin
mechanism and waste CPU when the remaining quota is less than
DAMON_MIN_REGION?

mm/damon/core.c:damon_do_apply_schemes() {
    ...
    if (quota->esz && quota->charged_sz + sz > quota->esz) {
        sz = ALIGN_DOWN(quota->esz - quota->charged_sz, DAMON_MIN_REGION);
        if (!sz)
            goto update_stat;
        damon_split_region_at(t, r, sz);
    }
    ...
}

When the remaining quota is less than DAMON_MIN_REGION, ALIGN_DOWN results in
sz == 0. The code then jumps to update_stat, bypassing the charged_sz update.
This prevents charged_sz from reaching esz, creating a pseudo-infinite
evaluation loop for the rest of the regions without saving the resume state.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260721045818.157773-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-21  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2026072059-refocus-lizard-6528@gregkh>
2026-07-21  4:58 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/core: make charge_addr_from aware of end-address exclusivity SJ Park
2026-07-21  5:08   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260721050823.685471F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox